首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Institutional proximity and the size and geography of foreign direct investment spillovers: Do European firms generate more favourable productivity spillovers in the European Union neighbourhood?
【24h】

Institutional proximity and the size and geography of foreign direct investment spillovers: Do European firms generate more favourable productivity spillovers in the European Union neighbourhood?

机译:制度上的接近以及外国直接投资外溢的规模和地理位置:欧洲公司是否在欧盟附近地区产生了更有利的生产率外溢?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The European Union (EU) association framework provides European businesses with an entry advantage into the associated countries by facilitating production links and encouraging institutional convergence. It is believed that this has multiple beneficial effects for the associated countries, including ones related to productivity spillovers accruing to domestic firms. However, no empirical evidence exists to show that the presence of European firms produces larger productivity spillovers in recipient economies compared to firms from other world regions. We examine this question using firm-level data covering 28 transition countries over the period 2002-2009. We estimate the intra-industry productivity effects of foreign ownership and examine how these differ across regional blocks (Central and Eastern Europe, South East Europe and European Neighbourhood Policy), by origin of investor (EU15 versus non-EU15), across geographical scales (national versus regional) and for different types of locations (capital-city regions versus the rest). Our results suggest that investments of EU origin play a distinctive role, helping raise domestic productivity in the associated countries unlike investments from outside the EU. However, this process operates in a spatially selective manner, potentially enhancing regional disparities and spatial imbalances. This assigns a particular responsibility for EU policy to devise interventions that will help redress these problems within its existing association framework.
机译:欧盟(EU)协会框架通过促进生产联系和鼓励机构融合为欧洲企业提供了进入关联国家的进入优势。可以相信,这对关联国家有多重有益的影响,包括与国内企业产生的生产率溢出有关的影响。但是,没有经验证据表明与来自其他世界地区的公司相比,欧洲公司的存在在受援国经济中产生了更大的生产率溢出效应。我们使用涵盖2002年至2009年期间28个转型国家的公司级数据来研究此问题。我们估算了外资所有权在产业内的生产率影响,并研究了不同地区(中欧和东欧,东南欧和欧洲邻国政策)在不同地区之间的差异(按投资者来源(欧盟15国与非欧盟15国))(国家和地区)以及不同类型的地区(首都城市地区与其他地区)。我们的结果表明,与欧盟以外的投资不同,欧盟来源的投资发挥了独特的作用,有助于提高相关国家的国内生产率。但是,此过程以空间选择性的方式进行,可能会加剧区域差异和空间失衡。这赋予欧盟制定设计干预措施的特殊责任,这些干预措施将有助于在其现有协会框架内解决这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号