首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning. A >Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada's 'four pillar' drug strategy
【24h】

Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada's 'four pillar' drug strategy

机译:专业知识,真相和城市政策动向:加拿大“四大支柱”毒品战略温哥华发展过程中的全球知识循环

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is growing attention across the social sciences to the mobility of people, products, and knowledge. This entails attempts to extend and/or rework existing understandings of global interconnections and is reflected in ongoing work on policy transfer-the process by which policy models are learned from one setting and deployed in others. This paper uses a case study of the development of an innovative approach to drug policy in Vancouver, British Columbia to deepen our understanding of what I call 'urban policy mobilities.' It details the often apparently mundane practices through which Vancouver's 'four-pillar' drug strategy-which combines prevention, treat-ment, enforcement, and harm reduction-was learned from cities outside North America and is now increasingly taught elsewhere. In doing so it draws on a neo-Foucauldian governmentality approach to emphasize the role of expertise (specialized knowledge held by many actors, not just credentialed professionals) and the deployment of certain powerful truths in the development of the policy. The paper concludes by discussing the spatialities of urban policy mobilities and raising questions about the political and conceptual importance of also maintaining a focus on the causes and consequences of policy immobilities.
机译:在整个社会科学领域,人们,产品和知识的流动性越来越受到关注。这需要尝试扩展和/或重新设计对全球互连的现有理解,并反映在正在进行的政策转移工作中,在该过程中,从一种环境中学习策略模型并在另一种环境中进行部署。本文以不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市毒品政策创新方法开发为例,以加深我们对所谓的“城市政策动员”的理解。它详细介绍了通常看似平凡的做法,从北美洲以外的城市那里学习了温哥华的“四支柱”毒品策略,该策略结合了预防,治疗,执法和减少危害,现在在其他地方越来越多地被教导。在此过程中,它采用了新葡萄牙式的政府方法,以强调专业知识的作用(许多参与者所拥有的专业知识,而不仅仅是具有资格的专业人士)以及在政策制定过程中运用某些强大的真理。本文最后通过讨论城市政策流动的空间,并提出了关于还应关注政策不流动的原因和后果的政治和概念重要性的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号