...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector
【24h】

Smart cities and green growth: outsourcing democratic and environmental resilience to the global technology sector

机译:智慧城市和绿色增长:将民主和环境弹性外包给全球技术部门

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Climate change and advances in urban technology propel forward the 'smart city'. As decision makers strive to find a technological fix, smart city strategies are often based on technological orthodoxies which are conceptually and empirically shallow. The motivation behind this paper is to address the conceptual adolescence which relates to the wholesale digitisation of the city by pursuing a twin argument about the democratic and environmental consequences. The authors draw on interdisciplinary theory and insights from urban studies, infrastructure, informatics, and the sociology of the Internet to critique the way the 'smart city' is taken forward. It is concluded that private firms market smart city services and solutions based on an ideological legacy of 'ubiquitous computing', 'universal infrastructure', and 'green technology'. Based on evidence from three UK cities-Manchester, Birmingham, and Glasgow-it is argued that the underlying principle of future city strategies is to expand the market for new technology products and services to support 'green growth' with disregard for their wider impacts. For citizens, becoming a consumer of the technologies is often presented as progressive 'participation' or 'empowerment' with unknown or hidden consequences both political and environmental. The city systems become a digital marketplace where citizen-consumers' participation is increasingly involuntary and the hegemony of global technology firms is inflated. What follows is that the city's 'intelligent systems' are defined through a digital consumer experience that has inherent biases and leaves parts of the city and its population unaccounted for. This renders the city less resilient in the face of future social and climatic risks.
机译:气候变化和城市技术的进步推动了“智慧城市”的发展。当决策者努力寻找技术解决方案时,智慧城市策略通常基于技术上的正统观念,而技术上的正统观念在概念和经验上都很浅薄。本文的目的是通过对民主和环境后果进行双重论证来解决与城市的整体数字化有关的概念青春期。作者利用跨学科理论和城市研究,基础设施,信息学和互联网社会学的见解来批评“智能城市”的发展方向。结论是,私营公司基于“普适计算”,“通用基础架构”和“绿色技术”的意识形态遗产来推销智能城市服务和解决方案。根据来自英国三个城市(曼彻斯特,伯明翰和格拉斯哥)的证据,有人认为,未来城市战略的基本原则是扩大新技术产品和服务的市场,以支持“绿色增长”,而不考虑其更广泛的影响。对于公民而言,成为技术的消费者通常被表示为渐进的“参与”或“授权”,无论政治还是环境方面都具有未知或隐蔽的后果。城市系统变成了一个数字市场,公民消费者的参与越来越不由自主,全球技术公司的霸权正在膨胀。随之而来的是,该城市的“智能系统”是通过数字消费者体验来定义的,这种体验具有固有的偏见,并且使城市及其人口的一部分无法估计。这使得该城市在面对未来的社会和气候风险时缺乏弹性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2014年第4期|803-819|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Urban Policy Studies, School of Environment and Development, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, England;

    Centre for Urban Policy Studies, School of Environment and Development, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    climate change; smart cities; ICT; democracy; future cities;

    机译:气候变化;智慧城市;ICT;民主;未来的城市;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号