...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >On Immanence and Indeterminacy: Black Feminism and Settler Colonialism
【24h】

On Immanence and Indeterminacy: Black Feminism and Settler Colonialism

机译:关于Inmanence和不确定性:黑色女权主义与定居者殖民主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The essays in this forum originated out of a roundtable at the American Studies Association meeting on the occupied territory of the Kanaka Maoli (Hawaii) in 2019, sponsored by Environment and Planning D: Society & Space. Our roundtable was conceptualized around an open question about Black feminism's relation to "settler colonialism," a term that is understood as a critical framework, categorical description, and/or narrative genre. Among our questions: does Black feminism intervene in a settler colonial critical discourse that has become the "preferred discourse for examining colonialism in North America" (King, 2019: 56)? Does Black feminism even need settler colonial critique? Or does it already offer an immanent critique of conquest, accumulation, dispossession, disposability, and erasure? These are hardly neutral questions, and they speak both to the broadening appeal of Black feminist theory across the humanities and social sciences, alongside growing disenchantment with the white male center of settler colonial studies. Our panel was met with feedback that reflected some of these developments. In the Q&A, an audience member asked how relevant the positionality of non-Black people of color (and presumably white people) was for advancing Black feminist thought. This was a question concerned with the appropriation of Black feminism by non-Black scholars. We also received criticism about the pairing of Black feminism and settler colonialism, a critical framing they felt validated Black feminism only by routing it through a white settler colonial paradigm oriented around the construction of an idealized Native subject. In other words, Black feminism should be understood as originating its own critique of settler colonialism. Our contributions do not aim to resolve these concerns but rather to sit with their indeterminacy. In place of resolution, we offer our own critical investments, whose areas of overlap and divergence reframe the norms of coalition.
机译:该论坛的论文起源于2019年关于凯卡茂利(夏威夷)的占领境内的美国研究协会会议的圆桌会议,由环境和规划D:社会和空间赞助。我们的圆桌会议围绕着黑人女权主义与“定居者殖民主义”的一个开放问题概念化了一个术语,该术语被理解为关键框架,分类描述和/或叙事类型。在我们的问题中:黑色女性主义是否在一个定居者殖民地批判性话语中介入,已成为“北美殖民主义的首选话语”(国王,2019:56)?黑色女权主义甚至需要定居者殖民批评吗?或者它已经提供了一个内在的征服,积累,消除,可用性和擦除批判吗?这些都是难以中立的问题,他们涉及在人文社会科学和社会科学中扩大黑色女权主义理论的吸引力,以及与定居者殖民研究的白人男性中心的祛魅。我们的小组举行了反馈反映其中一些发展的反馈。在Q&A中,观众询问了非黑人人类的位置(以及大概是白人)的位置如何用于推进黑色女权主义思想。这是一个关于非黑人学者对黑色女权主义的拨款的问题。我们还获得了对黑人女权主义和定居者殖民主义的配对的批评,这是一个关键的框架,他们只能通过在围绕着理想的原生主题的建设的白色定居者殖民地范式路由来验证黑色女权主义。换句话说,黑色女权主义应该被理解为源自批判的定居者殖民主义。我们的贡献并不目的是解决这些问题,而是坐在不确定的问题。代替解决方案,我们提供了我们自己的关键投资,其重叠和分歧领域重视联盟的规范。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning 》 |2021年第1期| 3-8| 共6页
  • 作者

    Iyko Day;

  • 作者单位

    Mount Holyoke College USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号