首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >EPA SHIFT FROM NAS RISK REVIEWS COULD PROLONG SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY
【24h】

EPA SHIFT FROM NAS RISK REVIEWS COULD PROLONG SCIENTIFIC UNCERTAINTY

机译:EPA脱离NAS风险审查可能造成长期的科学不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

EPA appears to have reversed a Bush-era policy of referring controversial scientific risk studies to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) for peer review and will instead ask the Science Advisory Board (SAB) or an independent external panel to provide provide advice and resolve conflicts, agency and other sources say.rnWhile the shift could speed external review of EPA studies and cut agency costs, some industry critics fear the move could prolong scientific uncertainty as SAB is often unable to reach consensus on complex scientific and technical matters.
机译:EPA似乎已经扭转了布什时代将有争议的科学风险研究交给美国国家科学院(NAS)进行同行评审的政策,而是要求科学顾问委员会(SAB)或独立的外部小组提供建议和解决方案机构和其他消息人士说,这种转变虽然可以加快对EPA研究的外部审查并降低机构成本,但一些行业批评家担心,此举可能会延长科学不确定性,因为SAB经常无法就复杂的科学技术问题达成共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号