...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Attacks Legality Of Data, Procedure For EPA Ozone NAAQS Review
【24h】

Industry Attacks Legality Of Data, Procedure For EPA Ozone NAAQS Review

机译:行业攻击数据合法性,EPA臭氧NAAQS审查程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Industry groups are warning EPA that its proposed stricter ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) is illegal because it relies on the same science the agency used to establish the less stringent 2008 NAAQS, and also violates the Clean Air Act procedure for conducting NAAQS revisions at five-year minimum intervals.rnThe claims could preview the basis for a future industry suit should EPA issue a final revised standard in line with its January proposal to tighten the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the range of 0.060-0.070 parts per million (ppm) compared to the Bush EPA's 2008 standard of 75ppm. EPA is revising the standard following lawsuits challenging the 2008 NAAQS, and is also proposing a welfare-based secondary NAAQS of 7-15 parts per million-hours.
机译:行业组织警告EPA,其提议的更严格的臭氧国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)是非法的,因为它依赖于该机构用于建立不太严格的2008 NAAQS的同一科学,并且还违反了《清洁空气法》程序来进行NAAQS修订。如果环保署根据其一月份的建议发布最终修订标准以将8小时臭氧NAAQS的范围控制在百万分之0.060-0.070的范围内,则索赔可以预示未来行业诉讼的依据。 ppm),而布什EPA的2008年标准为75ppm。 EPA在对2008年NAAQS提出诉讼之后,正在修订标准,并且还提出了基于福利的二次NAAQS(每百万小时7-15份)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号