首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Key Appellate Judges Suggest EPA Deference May Justify Carbofuran Ban
【24h】

Key Appellate Judges Suggest EPA Deference May Justify Carbofuran Ban

机译:上诉法院的主要法官认为,美国环保署的推迟可以证明对呋喃丹的禁止

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Federal appellate justices reviewing EPA's decision to eliminate safe residue levels for the pesticide carbofuran are suggesting that the complexity of the issue and deference to federal agencies may outweigh industry's objection to the agency's prohibition, though they opened the door to vacating a ban on food imports that contain chemical residue.rnAt March 22 oral arguments, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard industry's challenge to EPA's 2008 decision to revoke the residue tolerances for carbofuran. EPA's decision effectively barred the use of the chemical on crops grown domestically or abroad for the American market. The agency also rejected industry's request for an administrative law judge hearing on its decision.
机译:联邦上诉大法官审查了EPA消除杀虫剂呋喃丹的安全残留量的决定,这表明问题的复杂性以及对联邦机构的尊重可能超过了业界对该机构禁令的反对,尽管它们为取消食品进口禁令打开了大门。在3月22日的口头辩论中,美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的三人陪审团听取了业界对EPA于2008年决定撤销对呋喃丹的残留限量的质疑。 EPA的决定有效地禁止了在美国市场上国内外种植的农作物使用这种化学物质。该机构还拒绝了业界要求行政法律法官就其决定进行听证的请求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号