...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Ruling Extends Precedent Setting Five-Year Limit On NSR Enforcement Suits
【24h】

Ruling Extends Precedent Setting Five-Year Limit On NSR Enforcement Suits

机译:裁决延长了对NSR执法服设定五年限制的先例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Another federal appellate court has backed industry arguments that enforcement claims alleging violations of EPA's new source review (NSR) rules must be brought within five years of the alleged violation, marking the latest in a series of setbacks for the agency's premiere Clean Air Act enforcement program. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit ruled Aug. 21 in United States of America, et al. v EME Homer City Generation L.P. to dismiss a suit the agency brought against the owners of a major Pennsylvania coal-fired power plant for operating the plant without having pre-construction air permits for modifications the plant's former owners made more than a decade ago that allegedly increased emissions. The ruling is available on InsideEPA.com. Seepage 2 for details. (Doc ID: 2444552) A three-judge panel ruled unanimously that although prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) air permits are required before construction can start, they are not required for the operation of a facility, meaning PSD claims must be brought within a general five-year statute of limitations.
机译:另一个联邦上诉法院支持业界的论点,称声称违反环保署新源审查(NSR)规则的行为必须在指控的违法行为发生后五年内提出,这标志着该机构首演的《清洁空气法》执行计划遭受了一系列挫折中的最新一次。美国第三巡回上诉法院于8月21日在美国作出裁决,等。 v EME Homer City Generation LP驳回了该机构针对宾夕法尼亚州一家大型燃煤发电厂的所有者提起的诉讼,要求其运营该电厂,而未取得施工前的空气许可以修改该电厂的前所有者,这是十多年前据称的排放增加。该裁定可在InsideEPA.com上找到。有关详细信息,请参见第2页。 (文档ID:2444552)一个由三名法官组成的小组一致裁定,尽管在开始建造之前就需要防止明显恶化(PSD)的空气许可证,但对于设施的运行并不需要这些许可证,这意味着必须将PSD索赔要求包括在内一般时效五年法令。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号