首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Corps Says 6th Circuit Ruling Underscores CWA 404 Permitting Discretion
【24h】

Corps Says 6th Circuit Ruling Underscores CWA 404 Permitting Discretion

机译:军团表示第六巡回裁决强调CWA 404允许自由裁量权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A recent appellate ruling rejecting an environmentalist challenge to a Michigan hardrock mine sidestepped questions about whether groundwater falls under the reach of the Clean Water Act (CWA), though the Army Corps of Engineers says the ruling offers a precedential statement of its discretion in administering its dredge-and-fill permitting program. The Department of Justice (DOJ) on behalf of the Corps in November asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit to publish its ruling in Huron Mountain Club v. Army Corps of Engineers, et al., upholding a lower court's decision not to issue an injunction of mining activities at the Eagle Mine because it did not obtain a CWA section 404 permit. But in a Nov. 19 order, the court without comment declined the request, leaving the decision unpublished. Courts in future cases can still rely on and cite the Huron Mountain Club ruling, though as an unpublished opinion it would carry less weight and would not be binding.
机译:最近的一项上诉裁决驳斥了环保主义者对密歇根州硬岩矿的挑战,这一质疑回避了有关地下水是否属于《清洁水法》(CWA)管辖范围的问题,尽管美国陆军工程兵团表示该裁决提供了其酌情决定权来管理其地下水的先例性声明。挖泥填土许可程序。司法部(DOJ)于11月代表军团要求美国第六巡回上诉法院在休伦山俱乐部诉陆军工程兵团等人案中发布裁决,维持下级法院不予裁定的裁决。由于未获得CWA第404条的许可,因此在Eagle矿发布禁令。但是在11月19日的命令中,法院没有发表任何评论就拒绝了该请求,因此该裁决尚未公布。将来的法院仍然可以援引并援引Huron Mountain Club的裁决,尽管作为未公开的意见,它的影响力较小,并且不具有约束力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号