...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >District Court Ruling Highlights EPA Dilemma On Appealing NSR Suit Losses
【24h】

District Court Ruling Highlights EPA Dilemma On Appealing NSR Suit Losses

机译:地方法院裁定强调了EPA对NSR诉讼损失提起上诉的困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A federal district court's ruling dismissing the bulk of an EPA Clean Air Act new source review (NSR) enforcement action against a Texas utility underscores the dilemma the agency faces in deciding whether to appeal a series of losses in NSR cases, observers say, as adverse decisions on appeal could further limit EPA's NSR enforcement. EPA has lost several federal district court cases that claimed violations of the strict NSR permitting process. The recent Texas federal district court decision reinforces a strict statute of limitations approach that sets a time limit on pursuing such actions, while a federal district court in Michigan issued a ruling in 2011 that faulted the agency for pursuing NSR cases based on pre-construction projected emissions associated with plant upgrades.
机译:观察家说,联邦地方法院的裁决驳回了针对德克萨斯州一家公用事业的EPA清洁空气法新源审查(NSR)执法行动的大部分内容,这突显了该机构在决定是否对NSR案件中的一系列损失提起上诉时所面临的困境。上诉决定可能会进一步限制EPA的NSR执行。 EPA丢失了几起联邦地方法院案件,这些案件声称违反了严格的NSR许可程序。德克萨斯州联邦地方法院最近的决定加强了严格的时效法,为采取此类行动设定了时限,而密歇根州的联邦地方法院于2011年发布了一项裁决,该裁决错误地指责该机构根据预先构造的项目进行NSR诉讼与工厂升级相关的排放。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号