首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Differences In House, Senate TSCA Bills Hint At Contentious Conference
【24h】

Differences In House, Senate TSCA Bills Hint At Contentious Conference

机译:众议院的分歧,参议院TSCA法案在有争议的会议上有所提示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Differences between House and Senate Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) reform bills on major issues such as preemption of state chemicals programs and EPA prioritization for reviewing substances hint at likely contentious conference committee talks to try and close the policy gaps if lawmakers want TSCA reform to succeed. "The main difference now [between the House and Senate bills] is preemption," says one environmentalist, with the scaled-back House legislation taking a narrower approach to blocking state programs than a much broader Senate bill introduced by Sens. David Vitter (R-LA) and Tom Udall (D-NM). In the upper chamber, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and several other Democrats are opposing the bipartisan bill largely due to the preemption provision. If both chambers approve significantly different legislation then they will have to hold conference negotiations to craft a compromise bill that lawmakers could approve and send to President Obama for his signature.
机译:《众议院和参议院有毒物质控制法》(TSCA)改革法案之间在主要问题上的差异,例如国家化学品计划的先发制人和EPA审查物质的优先次序,这暗示着有争议的会议委员会的讨论,以试图缩小立法者的差距,如果立法者希望将TSCA改革成功。一位环保主义者说:“ [众议院和参议院法案之间的主要区别在于先发制人。”与参议员戴维·维特(Richard Vitter,R. -LA)和Tom Udall(D-NM)。在上议院中,参议员芭芭拉·义和团(D-CA)和其他几名民主党人反对两党法案,这在很大程度上是因为有先发制人的规定。如果两个参议院都通过了截然不同的立法,那么他们将不得不举行会议谈判,以制定一项妥协的法案,立法者可以批准该法案,并将其送交奥巴马总统签署。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号