首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >TSCA Reform Advocates Eye State-EPA Models To Guide Preemption Debate
【24h】

TSCA Reform Advocates Eye State-EPA Models To Guide Preemption Debate

机译:TSCA改革倡导“眼神州” -EPA模式指导先发制人辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Proponents of reforming the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) are weighing existing legislative models to help inform how to structure the bill's provisions on EPA and state partnerships on chemicals management and the extent to which the measure should preempt state programs - a major point of contention in the reform debate. During a recent hearing of the Senate Environment & Public Works Committee (EPW) on a revised bipartisan TSCA reform bill introduced this month by Sens. David Vitter (R-LA) and Tom Udall (D-NM), Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE), raised the issue of possible legislative models for managing the balance between EPA and states. Disputes over the extent of preemption have long served as a central hurdle in advancing a toxics law reform bill.
机译:支持改革《有毒物质控制法》(TSCA)的提议者正在权衡现有的立法模型,以帮助告知如何构建该法案中有关EPA的条款以及有关化学品管理的州合作伙伴关系,以及该措施应在多大程度上取代国家计划-这是争论的重点在改革辩论中。在参议院环境与公共工程委员会(EPW)最近的一次听证会上,参议员David Vitter(R-LA)和Tom Udall(D-NM)于本月提出了经修改的两党TSCA改革法案,Tom Carper(D -DE),提出了可能的立法模型来管理EPA与各州之间的平衡问题。长期以来,关于抢占范围的争议一直是推进有毒法律改革法案的主要障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号