首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Industry Wins Relief On EPA's HFC Leak Prevention Rule But Doubts Legality
【24h】

Industry Wins Relief On EPA's HFC Leak Prevention Rule But Doubts Legality

机译:工业界赢得了EPA的HFC防止泄漏规则的救济,但质疑合法性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

EPA's recently issued rule restricting leaks of climate-warming hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants from commercial equipment has provided industry groups with some relief compared to the proposed version but industry sources continue to doubt the agency's authority to regulate the substances under the air act. The agency softened provisions in the final rule, such as the leak mitigation provisions, after meeting Sept. 8 with representatives of the National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Project (NEDA/CAP) - a group whose members include Boeing Company, BP America, Koch Industries, Inc., Eli Lilly, Proctor & Gamble and others - that argued that the proposed version of the rule was overly stringent and EPA lacks authority to regulate the substances. In their comments on the proposed version of the section 608 rule, NEDA/CAP called the leak detection and prevention provisions both "punitive" because of their stringency, and "arbitrary."
机译:EPA最近发布的限制商业设备中气候变暖的氢氟碳化合物(HFC)制冷剂泄漏的规则为行业团体提供了一些缓解措施,但与提议的版本相比却有所减轻,但业内人士仍对该机构根据空气法案管制该物质的权限表示怀疑。在9月8日与美国国家环境发展协会的清洁空气项目(NEDA / CAP)的代表会面后,该机构软化了最终规则中的规定,例如减少泄漏的规定,该组织的成员包括波音公司,BP美国,科赫。 Industries,Inc.,礼来(Eli Lilly),宝洁(Proctor&Gamble)等公司辩称,该法规的拟议版本过于严格,而EPA却无权监管该物质。 NEDA / CAP在对第608条规则的拟议版本进行评论时,称泄漏检测和预防条款由于其严格性而被称为“惩罚性”,而被称为“任意性”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号