首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Judge Rejects Review Of CWA 'Jurisdiction' Order Despite High Court Ruling
【24h】

Judge Rejects Review Of CWA 'Jurisdiction' Order Despite High Court Ruling

机译:尽管高等法院裁定,法官仍拒绝对CWA“管辖权”命令的审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A federal judge has rejected a California farm's claim that the Constitution allows pre-enforcement judicial review of an Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act (CWA) cease-and-desist (C&D) letter to stop farming on land the Corps said is a CWA wetland, despite a Supreme Court ruling allowing review of related CWA "jurisdictional" findings. The June 10 decision by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California does not reference the high court's unanimous May 31 ruling in Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co. that granted judicial review of jurisdictional determinations (JDs). (Doc. ID: 192339) But the judge did hear some briefing on the issue of Hawkes' relevance to the case, so it poses a test of how courts might apply the Hawkes ruling to similar pre-enforcement decisions, including C&D letters.
机译:一名联邦法官拒绝了加利福尼亚农场的说法,即宪法允许对陆军工程兵团清洁水法(C&D)停止和终止(C&D)信进行执法前司法审查,以停止在该军团所说的土地上耕种湿地,尽管最高法院裁定允许复审相关的CWA“管辖权”调查结果。美国加利福尼亚东区地方法院地方法官金伯利·J·穆勒(Kimberly J.Mueller)在6月10日的判决中并未提及高等法院在5月31日对陆军工程兵诉霍克斯公司的一致裁定,该裁定对管辖权的裁决进行了司法审查( JDs)。 (文件ID:192339)但是法官确实听取了关于霍克斯与案子相关性的简要介绍,因此它检验了法院如何将霍克斯判决适用于类似的强制执行前判决,包括C&D信函。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号