...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >States Divided Over EPA Cost Assessment Justifying Utility MACT Air Rule
【24h】

States Divided Over EPA Cost Assessment Justifying Utility MACT Air Rule

机译:各州在EPA成本评估中存在分歧,证明了公用事业MACT空气规则的合理性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

States are divided over the merits of EPA's cost assessment that the agency says justifies its years-old decision that it was "appropriate and necessary" under the Clean Air Act to issue its air toxics rule for power plants, with some states backing the review while others are saying the study is based on a flawed analysis that undermines the air rule. The opposing comments, recently submitted to EPA on its proposed version of the cost review, could hint at arguments that states might make either defending or attacking the agency in an expected lawsuit over the final version of the assessment. EPA has said that it intends to finalize the review in mid-April - the same time for when utilities operating under a one-year compliance deadline for the air toxics rule must finally come into compliance.
机译:各州对EPA成本评估的优劣意见不一。环保局称,这证明了其多年的决定是合理的,根据《清洁空气法》,它为发电厂发布了空气有毒物质规则,其中一些州支持该评估,其他人则说,这项研究是基于有缺陷的分析,破坏了空中规则。最近提交给EPA的有关其成本审查提议版本的反对意见可能暗示一些论点,即各州可能在评估最终版本的预期诉讼中为该机构辩护或攻击该机构。 EPA表示,它打算在4月中旬完成审查,而与此同时,必须在一年的空气有毒物质法规合规期限内运行的公用事业最终合规。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号