首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >10th Circuit Questions Role Of High Court Ruling, Harm In WOTUS Appeal
【24h】

10th Circuit Questions Role Of High Court Ruling, Harm In WOTUS Appeal

机译:高级法院裁决的第10次回答问题,Wotus诉求伤害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit questioned attorneys Nov. 18 about the role of a major Supreme Court ruling in shaping federal regulations on the scope of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the potential harm to Colorado from a Trump administration CWA rule as they weighed whether to reverse a stay of the rule. Judges Carolyn McHugh, Bobby Baldock and Allison Eid pressed Colorado Solicitor General Eric Olson on the state's interpretation of the Supreme Court's fractured 2006 CWA decision in Rapanos v. United States and whether the Trump administration's waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule would cause the state irreparable harm.
机译:2011年11月第10次审议律师第十四届审理律师的三位法院小组关于11月18日关于一个主要的最高法院裁决在塑造联邦法规关于清洁水法范围(CWA)的作用以及对科罗拉多州的潜在伤害从特朗普行政CWA规则权衡是否扭转了规则。法官Carolyn Mchugh,Bobby Baldock and Allison Eid Collado律师将军Eric Olson在州立大学对Ravanos诉中最高法院的驳裂2006年CWA决定的解释。美国和特朗普政府的水域是否会导致美国(Wotus)的水域国家无法弥补的伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号