...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Divided CASAC Spars On PM Review But Leans Toward Retaining NAAQS
【24h】

Divided CASAC Spars On PM Review But Leans Toward Retaining NAAQS

机译:CASAC在PM审查上分歧不大,但倾向于保留NAAQS

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the advice of agency staff, a majority of EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) appears ready to recommend that officials retain existing particulate matter (PM) standards, but some members are questioning how to interpret the latest data and whether they can or should complete their review by the agency's tight deadline. At an Oct. 24 meeting in Cary, NC, four of the seven CASAC members spoke in favor of retaining the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for PM, while two members spoke to back agency staff's call for tightening the NAAQS. The standards must meet a Clean Air Act mandate to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety. A seventh CASAC member has been announced but is yet to join the panel. In addition to the split on the standard, a deep divide on procedural issues emerged at the meeting, with the same two panelists backing stricter NAAQS also calling for a halt to CASAC's review of the PM standards. A halt or delay would risk pushing completion of the review past the Trump administration's goal of finalizing a decision by late 2020 on whether to change the standards.
机译:根据机构工作人员的建议,大多数EPA的清洁空气科学咨询委员会(CASAC)似乎都建议建议官员保留现有的颗粒物(PM)标准,但是一些成员正在质疑如何解释最新数据以及他们是否可以或可以。应在该机构的紧迫截止日期之前完成审查。在10月24日于北卡罗来纳州卡里举行的会议上,七个CASAC成员中有四个赞成保留PM的国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS),而两名成员则对支持机构工作人员要求收紧NAAQS的讲话进行了发言。这些标准必须满足《清洁空气法》的要求,以在足够的安全范围内保护公众健康。 CASAC的第七位成员已经宣布,但尚未加入小组。除了对标准的分歧外,会议上在程序问题上也出现了严重分歧,同样两名小组成员支持更严格的NAAQS,也呼吁停止CASAC对PM标准的审查。停滞或拖延将有可能使审查的完成超出特朗普政府的目标,即到2020年末最终确定是否更改标准的决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号