首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Farm Agencies Fault Call To Curb Pesticides But One Seeks EPA Protections
【24h】

Farm Agencies Fault Call To Curb Pesticides But One Seeks EPA Protections

机译:农场机构呼吁遏制农药,但有人寻求EPA保护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Federal and state farm regulators are sharply criticizing a wildlife agency's novel opinion calling for limiting use of certain pesticides to protect listed species as the result of a failed Obama-era review process, though Washington state, while backing some of the criticism, is urging EPA to implement some of the opinion's protections for listed species.In separate comments to EPA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) back pesticide industry claims that the first biological opinion (BiOp) completed under an Obama-era process for assessing pesticides' risks to listed species is flawed and should be overhauled."USDA has grave concerns about this [BiOp] and strongly urges EPA to repudiate its findings and reinitiate consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)," USDA says. "This BiOp does not accurately assess the risk to endangered species, if any, posed by pesticides, because NMFS fails to establish that the data, assumptions, and analytical methods used, as well as the conclusions reached, are supported by facts and rational reasoning."
机译:联邦和州农场管理者正严厉批评野生生物机构的新颖见解,呼吁奥巴马政府通过失败的审查程序,限制使用某些农药来保护所列物种,尽管华盛顿州在支持某些批评的同时,敦促美国环保署 r n在对EPA的单独评论中,美国农业部(USDA)和国家农业部国家协会(NASDA)曾对农药行业表示反对,认为农药的第一份生物学意见( (BiOp)是在奥巴马时代评估农药对所列物种的风险的过程中完成的,因此存在缺陷,应予以彻底修改。 r n “ USDA对此[BiOp]表示严重关切,并强烈敦促EPA放弃其调查结果并重新进行磋商。与国家海洋渔业局(NMFS)合作,” “ USDA说。 “此BiOp无法准确评估农药对濒危物种(如果有的话)的风险,因为NMFS无法确定所使用的数据,假设和分析方法以及所得出的结论均得到事实和理性的支持。推理。”

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号