首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Critics Charge EPA's TSCA Data Guide Mirrors Controversial Science Rule
【24h】

Critics Charge EPA's TSCA Data Guide Mirrors Controversial Science Rule

机译:评论家指控EPA的TSCA数据指南反映了有争议的科学规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Environmentalists and other Trump administration critics are concerned that EPA's proposed approach for how it will gather and evaluate scientific information about chemicals under the revised Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) mirrors its controversial science transparency plan, which they say seeks to block studies that could drive stricter rules. "The TSCA method's arbitrary, unscientific scoring and exclusion of studies is right in line with other attempts to restrict the science EPA relies on, such as the recent 'censored science' proposal from former Administrator [Scott] Pruitt," write researchers with the University of California San Francisco's Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment (PRHE) in an Aug. 17 blog. Other critics go even further, with Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) warning in Aug. 16 comments that the so-called systematic review framework could be vulnerable to legal challenges, though EPA says the document is not a final action subject to judicial review. Relevant documents are available on InsideEPA.com. (Doc. ID: 214505).
机译:环保主义者和其他特朗普政府的批评者担心,EPA根据修订的《有毒物质控制法案》(TSCA)收集和评估有关化学品的科学信息的拟议方法反映了其有争议的科学透明度计划,他们说,该计划旨在阻止可能推动研究的研究更严格的规则。 “ TSCA方法的任意性,不科学的评分和排除研究与其他限制EPA所依赖的科学的尝试是正确的,例如前行政长官[Scott] Pruitt最近提出的“审查科学”提议,”研究人员写道。加州大学旧金山分校生殖健康与环境计划(PRHE)于8月17日发表博客。其他批评者则走得更远,8月16日,美国环境保护基金(EDF)警告说,所谓的系统审查框架可能易受法律挑战的影响,尽管EPA表示该文件不是接受司法审查的最终行动。有关文件可在InsideEPA.com上找到。 (文档ID:214505)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号