首页> 外文期刊>Engineering news-record >Surety Bonds' Advantage For Owners Over Sub Default Insurance
【24h】

Surety Bonds' Advantage For Owners Over Sub Default Insurance

机译:担保债券对业主的保护优于次级违约保险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Subcontractor default insurance (SDI) remains a popular alternative to surety bonds, with its primary selling point-premium savings for the coverage purchaser. Most project owners assume they are protected from subcontractor default when the construction manager (CM) or general contractor (GC) purchases an SDI policy. However, a mounting number of court decisions prove otherwise. Unless the project owner purchases the SDI policy and is the named insured, coverage may be unavailable to the project owner to offset its losses in the event of a subcontractor default. Even being named by an endorsement to a CM or GC's SDI policy does not guarantee coverage for the project owner, due to very strict insurance coverage limitations that are often contained within those policies.
机译:分包商违约保险(SDI)仍然是担保债券的一种流行替代方法,它为承保范围内的购买者节省了主要卖点。大多数项目所有者认为,当施工经理(CM)或总承包商(GC)购买SDI政策时,他们会受到保护,免受分包商违约的侵害。但是,越来越多的法院判决证明并非如此。除非项目所有者购买了SDI保单并指定了被保险人,否则在分包商违约的情况下,项目所有者可能无法获得承保范围以弥补其损失。即使是通过CM或GC的SDI保单的背书来命名,也由于项目保单中经常包含非常严格的保险范围限制,因此不能保证为项目所有者提供保额。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Engineering news-record》 |2015年第8期|36-36|共1页
  • 作者

    Robert Staples;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:11:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号