首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Evaluation of operation and control in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) system using exergy analysis method
【24h】

Evaluation of operation and control in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) system using exergy analysis method

机译:使用(火用)分析方法评估HVAC(采暖,通风和空调)系统的运行和控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The optimal control strategy proposed for HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) systems was usually compared with the original one, in which the disparity with perfect operation was seldom discussed. Based on the exergy analysis models developed, this paper presents a CPI (control-perfect index) method to evaluate control of HVAC systems as well as obtain the disparity of candidate strategy with ideal operation. Through minimizing the exergy loss in HVAC system, the limited-ideal operation corresponding to specific operation condition is obtained. With DEA (data envelopment analysis) method, the optimization frontier is trended by sets of limited-ideal operation points and viewed as ideal operation. With the benchmark of ideal operation, the CPI scores of various control strategies can be evaluated. An airport HVAC system is selected as a case study and its simulation is validated using the real operation data. Six control strategies used in the HVAC system are evaluated. The results show that the original strategy has the lowest efficiency. Other five optimal strategies have the higher efficiencies because of their higher CPI scores. The disparity of each strategy with ideal operation is also estimated, which points to the inherent challenge of developing global optimal algorithm. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通常将针对HVAC(供暖,通风和空调)系统提出的最佳控制策略与原始系统进行比较,在原始控制系统中,很少讨论与完美运行之间的差异。基于开发的火用分析模型,本文提出了一种CPI(控制完美指数)方法来评估HVAC系统的控制,并获得理想操作下候选策略的差异。通过最小化HVAC系统的火用损失,可以获得与特定运行条件相对应的有限理想运行。通过DEA(数据包络分析)方法,优化边界由一组理想操作点趋向并被视为理想操作。以理想操作为基准,可以评估各种控制策略的CPI得分。选择机场HVAC系统作为案例研究,并使用实际运行数据验证其仿真。评估了HVAC系统中使用的六种控制策略。结果表明,原始策略的效率最低。其他五种最佳策略由于具有较高的CPI分数而具有较高的效率。还估计了每种策略与理想操作之间的差异,这指出了开发全局最优算法的内在挑战。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号