首页> 外文期刊>Energy >The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method
【24h】

The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method

机译:基于VIKOR方法的旅游胜地可再生能源系统方案综合评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The selection of the renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts is a multi-criteria decision problem. This paper firstly establishes an evaluation criteria system which comprises three main criteria and nine sub-criteria for the renewable energy system. Then Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompro-misno Resenje (VIKOR) method is adopted to rank the renewable energy system schemes. Finally, six renewable energy system schemes in a tourist resort are selected to demonstrate the proposed method. The results indicate that the weight of economy, technology and environment are 0.6, 0.2 and 0.2 respectively. And the general weights of the sub-criteria are: 0.348 (B_(11)), 0.186 (B_(12)), 0.066 (B_(13)), 0.086 (B_(21)), 0.086 (B_(22)), 0.028 (B_(23)), 0.04 (B_(31)), 0.12 (B_(32)) and 0.04 (B_(33)). The general weight of the investment cost and the annual operation cost accounts for a relatively large proportion, which is 34.8% and 18.6% respectively. The ranking order of the six schemes based on Q_j, S_j, and R_j are Q_2>Q_6>Q_5>Q_4>Q_3>Q_1. S_2>S_6>S_4>S_5>S_1>S_3 and R_6>R_2>R_5>R_3>R_4>R_1 respectively. After a compromise, the final ranking results are: Scheme 2, Scheme 6 > Scheme 5, Scheme 4 > Scheme 3, Scheme 1. This study can provide guidance for the decision makers to determine the renewable energy system scheme in tourist resorts.
机译:旅游胜地中可再生能源系统方案的选择是一个多标准决策问题。本文首先建立了评价标准体系,该体系包括可再生能源系统的三个主要标准和九个子标准。然后采用Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompro-misno Resenje(VIKOR)方法对可再生能源系统方案进行排名。最后,在一个旅游胜地中选择了六个可再生能源系统方案来论证该方法。结果表明,经济,技术和环境的权重分别为0.6、0.2和0.2。子条件的一般权重为:0.348(B_(11)),0.186(B_(12)),0.066(B_(13)),0.086(B_(21)),0.086(B_(22)) ,0.028(B_(23)),0.04(B_(31)),0.12(B_(32))和0.04(B_(33))。投资成本的一般权重和年度运营成本所占的比重较大,分别为34.8%和18.6%。基于Q_j,S_j和R_j的六个方案的排名顺序为Q_2> Q_6> Q_5> Q_4> Q_3> Q_1。 S_2> S_6> S_4> S_5> S_1> S_3和R_6> R_2> R_5> R_3> R_4> R_1。经过折衷,最终排名结果是:方案2,方案6>方案5,方案4>方案3,方案1。本研究可以为决策者确定旅游胜地的可再生能源系统方案提供指导。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2020年第15期|116676.1-116676.12|共12页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位

    School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering North China Electric Power University Baoding 071003 China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Tourist resorts; Energy system; Renewable energy; VIKOR; Compromise;

    机译:旅游胜地;能源系统;再生能源;VIKOR;妥协;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号