...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Energy intensity and its differences across China's regions: Combining econometric and decomposition analysis
【24h】

Energy intensity and its differences across China's regions: Combining econometric and decomposition analysis

机译:中国各地区的能源强度及其差异:计量经济与分解分析相结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

To achieve the energy intensity reduction targets set by the Chinese government policymakers need to understand the key drivers that contribute to regional variations in energy intensity. Understanding regional differences will contribute to the design of more effective energy policies. To facilitate this understanding we estimate a penalized panel quantile regression model that accounts for unobserved individual heterogeneity and distributional heterogeneity across the regions of China. The effects of economic growth, urbanization, foreign direct investment, energy structure, and industrialization, on energy intensity differ across quantiles. The effects of economic growth and foreign direct investment on energy intensity are negative and significant at every quantile. A 1% increase in foreign direct investment decreases energy intensity along the entire conditional distribution, ranging from 7.5% at 10th quantile to 3.7% at 90th quantile. The effects of urbanization and industrialization on energy intensity are positive and significant at every quantile. Moreover, a 1% increase in industrialization lifts energy intensity by 54% at 10th quantile and 33% per cent at 90th quantile. The results from a Shapley decomposition model further show that economic growth is the most prominent factor that contributes to energy intensity differences, following by industrialization, foreign direct investment and energy structure. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:为了实现中国政府设定的降低能源强度的目标,政策制定者需要了解导致能源强度区域差异的主要驱动因素。了解区域差异将有助于设计更有效的能源政策。为了促进这种理解,我们估计了一个惩罚性面板分位数回归模型,该模型解释了中国地区未观察到的个体异质性和分布异质性。经济增长,城市化,外国直接投资,能源结构和工业化对能源强度的影响因分位数而异。经济增长和外国直接投资对能源强度的影响是负面的,并且在每个分位数上都是显着的。外国直接投资每增加1%,就会降低整个条件分布中的能源强度,范围从第10位的7.5%到第90位的3.7%。城市化和工业化对能源强度的影响是积极的,并且在每个分位数上都是显着的。此外,工业化水平每提高1%,能源强度在第10位提高54%,在第90位提高33%。 Shapley分解模型的结果进一步表明,经济增长是导致能源强度差异的最主要因素,其次是工业化,外国直接投资和能源结构。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy》 |2019年第1期|989-1000|共12页
  • 作者单位

    North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China|North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China;

    North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China|North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China;

    Univ Auckland, Energy Ctr, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;

    Univ Auckland, Energy Ctr, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Energy intensity; Energy intensity differences; Penalized panel quantile regression; Shapely decomposition; China;

    机译:能量强度能量强度差罚面板分位数回归形状分解中国;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号