...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy >Solid-state refrigeration: A comparison of the energy performances of caloric materials operating in an active caloric regenerator
【24h】

Solid-state refrigeration: A comparison of the energy performances of caloric materials operating in an active caloric regenerator

机译:固态制冷:在主动式热量再生器中运行的热量材料的能量性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The energy performances of an Active Caloric Refrigerator are reported in this paper. An ACR is tested under a vast number of solid-state refrigerants exhibiting one of the four main caloric effects considered for refrigeration (magnetocaloric, electrocaloric, elastocaloric and barocaloric effect). The analysis is performed numerically through a 2D model, experimentally validated, that can reproduce the behavior of an Active Caloric Regenerator. Temperature span, cooling power and coefficient of performance are the indexes through which the comparison is carried out. The tests are performed at a fixed AMR cycle frequency (1.25 Hz), in the temperature range 292-300 K, varying the mass flux in the range 150-250 kg s(-1) m(-2). The most promising caloric materials that have been tested as refrigerants are: Gd, Gd5Si2Ge2, LaFe11.384Mn0.356Si1.261-11.52, LaFe11.0Co0.94Si1.10 (magnetocaloric materials); P(VDF-TrFE-CFE)/ BST polymer, 0.93PMN-0.07PT thin film, the Pb1-3x/2LaxZr0.15Ti0.15O3 with single and variable composition, PbTiO3, Pb0.8Ba0.2ZrO3, Pb0.97La0.02(Zr0.75Sn0.8Ti0.07)O-3(electrocaloric materials); Cu68.13Zn15.74Al16.13, NiTi, PbTiO3 (elastocaloric materials); (NH4)(2)MoO2F4, MnCoGe(0.99)ln(0.01) (barocaloric materials). Among them, PLZT and in particular Pb0.97La0.02(Zr(0.75)SnomTi(0.07))O-3 show the best results, higher than every other caloric material tested, conferring to electrocaloric refrigeration globally the most promising behavior. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文报道了主动式热量冰箱的能量性能。 ACR在大量固态制冷剂下进行了测试,这些制冷剂表现出了制冷所考虑的四种主要热量效应之一(磁热,电热,弹性和压力)。该分析是通过2D模型进行数值模拟的,并经过实验验证,该模型可以重现Active Caloric Regenerator的行为。温度跨度,冷却功率和性能系数是进行比较的指标。测试在292-300 K的温度范围内以固定的AMR循环频率(1.25 Hz)进行,质量流量在150-250 kg s(-1)m(-2)范围内变化。已被测试为制冷剂的最有希望的热量材料是:Gd,Gd5Si2Ge2,LaFe11.384Mn0.356Si1.261-11.52,LaFe11.0Co0.94Si1.10(磁热材料); P(VDF-TrFE-CFE)/ BST聚合物,0.93PMN-0.07PT薄膜,具有单一且可变组成的Pb1-3x / 2LaxZr0.15Ti0.15O3,PbTiO3,Pb0.8Ba0.2ZrO3,Pb0.97La0.02( Zr0.75Sn0.8Ti0.07)O-3(电热材料); Cu68.13Zn15.74Al16.13,NiTi,PbTiO3(弹性材料); (NH4)(2)MoO2F4,MnCoGe(0.99)ln(0.01)(压力材料)。其中,PLZT尤其是Pb0.97La0.02(Zr(0.75)SnomTi(0.07))O-3表现出最好的结果,高于其他所有测试过的热量材料,这在全球范围内为电热量制冷提供了最有前途的行为。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号