首页> 外文期刊>Energy and power engineering >Fuzzy vs. Probabilistic Techniques to Address Uncertainty for Radial Distribution Load Flow Simulation
【24h】

Fuzzy vs. Probabilistic Techniques to Address Uncertainty for Radial Distribution Load Flow Simulation

机译:模糊与概率技术解决径向分布潮流模拟的不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For Power distribution system the most important task for distribution engineer is to efficiently simulate the system and address the uncertainty using a suitable mathematical method. This paper presents a comparison of two methods used in analyzing uncertainties. The first method is Montecarlo simulation (MCS) that considers input parameters as random variables and second one is fuzzy alpha cut method (FAC) in which uncertain parameters are treated as fuzzy numbers with given membership functions. Both techniques are tested on a typical Load flow solution simulation, where connected loads are considered as uncertain. In order to provide a basis for comparison between above two approaches, the shapes of the membership function used in the fuzzy method is taken same as the shape of the probability density function used in the Monte Carlo simulations. For more than one uncertain input variable, simulation result indicates that MCS method provides better output results compared to FAC, however takes more time due to number of runs. FAC provides an alternate method to MCS when addressing single or limited input variables and is fast.
机译:对于配电系统,配电工程师最重要的任务是使用合适的数学方法有效地仿真系统并解决不确定性问题。本文介绍了两种用于分析不确定性的方法的比较。第一种方法是将输入参数视为随机变量的蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS),第二种方法是模糊α割方法(FAC),其中使用给定的隶属函数将不确定的参数视为模糊数。两种技术均在典型的潮流解决方案仿真中进行了测试,在这种仿真中,连接的负载被认为是不确定的。为了为以上两种方法之间的比较提供基础,将模糊方法中使用的隶属函数的形状与蒙特卡洛模拟中使用的概率密度函数的形状相同。对于不止一个不确定的输入变量,仿真结果表明,与FAC相比,MCS方法提供了更好的输出结果,但是由于运行次数而花费了更多时间。当处理单个或有限的输入变量时,FAC为MCS提供了一种替代方法,并且速度很快。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号