首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Competition in the market for space heating. District heating as the infrastructure for competition among fuels and technologies
【24h】

Competition in the market for space heating. District heating as the infrastructure for competition among fuels and technologies

机译:空间供暖市场的竞争。区域供热作为燃料和技术之间竞争的基础设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

None of the EU directives on liberalisation of the electricity and gas markets are considering the district heating systems, although the district heating networks offer the possibility of competition between natural gas and a range of other fuels on the market for space heating. Cogeneration of electricity and heat for industrial processes or district heating is a technology option for increased energy efficiency and thus reduction of CO_2 emissions. In the mid-1990s less than 10% of the electricity generation in the European Union was combined production with significant variations among Member States. These variations are explained by different national legislation and relative power of institutions, rather than difference in industrial structure, climate or urban physical structure. The 'single energy carrier' directives have provisions that support the development of combined heat and power (CHP), but they do not support the development and expansion of the district heating infrastructure. The article is partly based on a contribution to the Shared Analysis Project for the European Commission DG Energy, concerning the penetration of CHP, energy saving, and renewables as instruments to meet the targets of the Kyoto Protocol within the liberalised European energy market. The quantitative and legal differences of the heat markets in selected Member States are described, and the consequences of the directives are discussed. Finally, we summarise the tasks for a European policy concerning the future regulation of district heating networks for CUP, emphasising the need for rules for a fair competition between natural gas and district heating networks.
机译:尽管区域供热网络提供了天然气与市场上用于空间供热的其他多种燃料之间竞争的可能性,但欧盟关于电力和天然气市场自由化的指令均未考虑使用区域供热系统。工业过程或区域供热的热电联产是提高能源效率从而减少CO_2排放的技术选择。在1990年代中期,欧盟的发电量不足总产量的10%,各成员国之间的发电量差异很大。这些差异是由不同的国家立法和机构的相对权力来解释的,而不是由产业结构,气候或城市自然结构上的差异来解释的。 “单一能源载体”指令具有支持热电联产(CHP)发展的规定,但不支持区域供热基础设施的发展和扩展。本文部分基于对欧盟DG能源共享分析项目的贡献,涉及热电联产,节能和可再生能源的渗透,以此作为在开放的欧洲能源市场中实现《京都议定书》目标的工具。描述了选定会员国供热市场的数量和法律差异,并讨论了指令的后果。最后,我们总结了有关未来对中国银联的区域供热网络的监管的欧洲政策的任务,强调了制定天然气与区域供热网络之间公平竞争的规则的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号