首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Can negotiated agreements replace efficiency standards as an instrument for transforming the electrical appliance market?
【24h】

Can negotiated agreements replace efficiency standards as an instrument for transforming the electrical appliance market?

机译:谈判达成的协议能否取代效率标准,从而成为改变电器市场的工具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Without reinforced energy saving policies, residential consumption of electricity will increase sharply over the next 20 years, in particular, as a result of expected growth in the specific uses of electricity. The main problem is not a lack of energy-efficient technologies, which do indeed exist for electrical appliances, but one of slow diffusion of existing technologies due to the weakness of the price signal and the purchasing behaviour of consumers. In association with energy labelling, minimum energy performance standards have proved to be very effective in stimulating technological progress and organising market transformation. But standards also suffer from long and often difficult implementation periods because of the resistance of the industrial sector. For manufacturers, similar results could be obtained more easily and more rapidly with voluntary agreements because they introduce flexibility margins in the achievement of commitments. This paper analyses the specific advantages of voluntary agreements for improving energy efficiency in the domestic appliances sector. We conclude that voluntary agreements may be an effective instrument for market transformation in certain conditions, but the alternative of regulatory measures must remain a credible, realistic threat if voluntary agreements are to have a really significant impact on performance improvement.
机译:如果没有加强的节能政策,在未来20年内,居民的用电量将急剧增加,特别是由于特定用电量的预期增长。主要问题不是缺乏节能技术,而节能技术确实存在于电器中,而是由于价格信号和消费者的购买行为薄弱而导致的现有技术的缓慢传播之一。与能源标签相关联,最低能源性能标准已被证明在刺激技术进步和组织市场转型方面非常有效。但是由于工业部门的抵制,标准的实施周期也很长,而且通常很困难。对于制造商而言,通过自愿协议可以更容易,更快地获得类似的结果,因为它们在履行承诺时引入了灵活性余量。本文分析了自愿协议对提高家用电器行业能源效率的具体优势。我们得出的结论是,自愿协议在某些条件下可能是市场转型的有效手段,但如果自愿协议要对绩效改善产生真正重大影响,则替代监管措施必须仍然是可信的,现实的威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号