...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >What do we know about carbon taxes? An inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income
【24h】

What do we know about carbon taxes? An inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and distribution of income

机译:我们对碳税了解多少?调查其对竞争力和收入分配的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) has set legally binding emissions targets for a basket of six greenhouse gases and timetables for industrialised countries. It has also incorporated three international flexibility mechanisms. However, the Articles defining the flexibility mechanisms carry wording that their use must be supplemental to domestic actions. This has led to the open debates on interpretations of these supplementarity provisions. Such debates ended at the resumed sixth Conference of the Parlies (COP) to the UNFCCC, held in Bonn, July 2001, and at the subsequent COP-7 in Marrakesh, November 2001. The final wording in the Bonn Agreement, reaffirmed in the Marrakesh Accords, at least indicates that domestic policies will have an important role to play in meeting Annex B countries' emissions commitments. Carbon taxes have long been advocated because of their cost effectiveness in achieving a given emissions reduction. In this paper, the main economic impacts of carbon taxes are assessed. Based on a review of empirical studies on existing carbon/energy (axes, it is concluded that competitive losses and distributive impacts are generally not significant and definitely less than often perceived. However, given the ultimate objective of the Framework Convention, future carbon taxes could have higher rates than those already imposed and thus the resulting economic impacts could be more acute. In this context, it has been shown that how to use the generated fiscal revenues will be of fundamental importance in determining the final economic impacts of carbon taxes. Finally, we briefly discuss carbon taxes in combination with other domestic and international instruments.
机译:《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)的《京都议定书》为一揽子六种温室气体和工业化国家的时间表设定了具有法律约束力的排放目标。它还纳入了三个国际灵活性机制。但是,在定义灵活性机制的条款中措词是,必须对国内行动加以补充。这导致对这些补充条款的解释进行公开辩论。此类辩论在2001年7月在波恩举行的第六届联合国气候变化框架公约缔约国会议(COP)和2001年11月在马拉喀什举行的COP-7缔约方会议续会上结束。协议至少表明,国内政策将在履行附件B国家的排放承诺中发挥重要作用。长期以来一直倡导碳税,因为碳税在实现既定的减排量方面具有成本效益。本文评估了碳税的主要经济影响。根据对现有碳/能源(轴)实证研究的回顾,得出的结论是,竞争性损失和分配影响通常并不重要,而且肯定比人们通常认为的要少。但是,鉴于框架公约的最终目标,未来的碳税可以在这种情况下,已经证明了如何使用产生的财政收入对于确定碳税的最终经济影响至关重要。 ,我们将与其他国内和国际工具一起简要讨论碳税。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号