首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Estonian electricity supply scenarios for 2020 and their environmental performance
【24h】

Estonian electricity supply scenarios for 2020 and their environmental performance

机译:爱沙尼亚2020年的电力供应情景及其环境绩效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Estonia is the only country in Europe with significant environmentally intensive oil shale-based energy production. However, the legal obligations of the EU will make substantial changes over the coming years to current electricity production technology. Increasing the use of alternative energy carriers for responding to future requirements has also been in focus. In this study, three different future electricity supply scenarios for Estonia in 2020 are considered and compared to the situation in 2002. They are based on domestic oil shale, imported natural gas, and imported nuclear power. According to the aims of the national energy policy, renewable energy sources were raised to 10% in all scenarios. Using the LCA methodology, the least damaging impact on the environment occurs in the 'nuclear scenario', with nuclear energy as the main energy source. The best scenario, however, depends on the weight or acceptance of accidental releases or other impacts not defined in this context. The 'Oil shale scenario' would be a slightly more damaging alternative than the 'Natural gas scenario' even if new technical solutions will remarkably improve the environmental performance of oil shale electricity production. Land use and waste disposal are crucial issues, particularly for oil shale and nuclear electricity production. However, the depletion of oil shale is not as critical an issue as the depletion of natural gas and uranium. According to the significance analysis of impact categories, climate change is the most significant impact on the environment in the scenarios. Future decisions on the development of the Estonian energy sector are most likely to be based on technological, economical and political aspects. Political aspects are likely to be the most significant. However, this type of study can give additional value to the discussion due to the increasing role of sustainability in energy issues.
机译:爱沙尼亚是欧洲唯一一个以油页岩为基础的能源密集型环境生产国。但是,欧盟的法律义务将在未来几年内对当前的电力生产技术做出重大改变。越来越多地使用替代能源载体来应对未来的需求也成为关注焦点。在本研究中,考虑了2020年爱沙尼亚三种不同的未来电力供应情景,并将它们与2002年的状况进行了比较。它们基于国内油页岩,进口天然气和进口核电。根据国家能源政策的目标,在所有情况下可再生能源均提高到10%。使用LCA方法,以核能为主要能源,在“核情景”中对环境的破坏最小。但是,最佳方案取决于意外释放的重量或接受程度或在此上下文中未定义的其他影响。即使新的技术解决方案将显着改善油页岩电力生产的环境绩效,“油页岩方案”也将比“天然气方案”更具破坏性。土地使用和废物处置是至关重要的问题,特别是对于油页岩和核电生产。但是,油页岩的枯竭并不像天然气和铀的枯竭那么重要。根据影响类别的显着性分析,在情景中,气候变化是对环境的最大影响。关于爱沙尼亚能源部门发展的未来决定最有可能基于技术,经济和政治方面。政治方面可能是最重要的。但是,由于可持续性在能源问题中的作用越来越大,这种类型的研究可以为讨论提供更多的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号