首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis
【24h】

Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis

机译:能源技术政策中学习曲线的使用和局限性:组件学习假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, we investigate the use of learning curves for the description of observed cost reductions for a variety of energy technologies. Starting point of our analysis is the representation of energy processes and technologies as the sum of different components. While we recognize that in many cases "learning-by-doing" may improve the overall costs or efficiency of a technology, we argue that so far insufficient attention has been devoted to study the effects of single component improvements that together may explain an aggregated form of learning. Indeed, for an entire technology the phenomenon of learning-by-doing may well result from learning of one or a few individual components only. We analyze under what conditions it is possible to combine learning curves for single components to derive one comprehensive learning curve for the total product. The possibility that for certain technologies some components (e.g., the primary natural resources that serve as essential input) do not exhibit cost improvements might account for the apparent time dependence of learning rates reported in several studies (the learning rate might also change considerably over time depending on the data set considered, a crucial issue to be aware of when one uses the learning curve methodology). Such an explanation may have important consequences for the extent to which learning curves can be extrapolated into the future. This argumentation suggests that cost reductions may not continue indefinitely and that well-behaved learning curves do not necessarily exist for every product or technology. In addition, even for diffusing and maturing technologies that display clear learning effects, market and resource constraints can eventually significantly reduce the scope for further improvements in their fabrication or use. It appears likely that some technologies, such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells, are significantly more amenable than others to industry-wide learning. For such technologies we assess the reliability of using learning curves at large to forecast energy technology cost reductions.
机译:在本文中,我们调查了学习曲线的使用,以描述各种能源技术可观察到的成本降低。我们分析的起点是将能源过程和技术表示为不同组成部分的总和。尽管我们认识到在许多情况下“边做边学”可能会提高技术的总体成本或效率,但我们认为,到目前为止,人们对研究单个组件改进的影响的关注不足,这些改进共同解释了汇总形式学习。实际上,对于整个技术而言,边做边学的现象很可能仅通过学习一个或几个单个组件而产生。我们分析了在什么条件下可以组合单个组件的学习曲线以得出整个产品的一条综合学习曲线。对于某些技术,某些组件(例如,用作基本输入的主要自然资源)未显示出成本改善的可能性,可能解释了几项研究报告的学习率与时间的明显依赖关系(学习率也可能随着时间而发生很大变化。取决于所考虑的数据集,这是在使用学习曲线方法时要意识到的一个关键问题)。这种解释可能会对学习曲线可以外推到未来的程度产生重要影响。该论点表明,降低成本可能不会无限期地持续下去,并且不一定对每种产品或技术都存在行为良好的学习曲线。此外,即使对于具有明显学习效果的扩散和成熟技术,市场和资源限制最终仍会显着减小其制造或使用方面进一步改进的范围。似乎某些技术(例如风力涡轮机和光伏电池)比其他技术更适合全行业学习。对于此类技术,我们评估了使用总体学习曲线预测能源技术成本降低的可靠性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2009年第7期|2525-2535|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Energy Research Centre of The Netherlands (ECN), Policy Studies Department, Petten/Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Energy Research Centre of The Netherlands (ECN). Policy Studies Department, Petten/Amsterdam, The Netherlands;

    Energy Research Centre of The Netherlands (ECN). Policy Studies Department, Petten/Amsterdam, The Netherlands The Earth Institute, Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy, Columbia University, New York, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    energy technology; learning by doing; experience curve;

    机译:能源技术;边干边学;经验曲线;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号