首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system
【24h】

Comparative analysis of battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and hybrid vehicles in a future sustainable road transport system

机译:未来可持续道路运输系统中的电池电动,氢燃料电池和混合动力汽车的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper compares battery electric vehicles (BEV) to hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) and hydrogen fuel cell plug-in hybrid vehicles (FCHEV). Qualitative comparisons of technologies and infrastructural requirements, and quantitative comparisons of the lifecycle cost of the powertrain over 100,000 mile are undertaken, accounting for capital and fuel costs. A common vehicle platform is assumed. The 2030 scenario is discussed and compared to a conventional gasoline-fuelled internal combustion engine (ICE) powertrain. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis shows that in 2030 FCEVs could achieve lifecycle cost parity with conventional gasoline vehicles. However, both the BEV and FCHEV have significantly lower lifecycle costs. In the 2030 scenario, powertrain lifecycle costs of FCEVs range from $7360 to $22,580, whereas those for BEVs range from $6460 to $11,420 and FCHEVs, from $4310 to $12,540. All vehicle platforms exhibit significant cost sensitivity to powertrain capital cost The BEV and FCHEV are relatively insensitive to electricity costs but the FCHEV and FCV are sensitive to hydrogen cost The BEV and FCHEV are reasonably similar in lifecycle cost and one may offer an advantage over the other depending on driving patterns. A key conclusion is that the best path for future development of FCEVs is the FCHEV.
机译:本文将电池电动汽车(BEV)与氢燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)和氢燃料电池插电式混合动力汽车(FCHEV)进行了比较。进行了技术和基础设施要求的定性比较,并对超过100,000英里的动力总成的生命周期成本进行了定量比较,其中包括资本和燃料成本。假定使用通用的车辆平台。对2030年的情景进行了讨论,并将其与传统的汽油内燃机(ICE)动力总成进行了比较。全面的敏感性分析表明,到2030年,FCEV可以达到与传统汽油车相同的生命周期成本。但是,BEV和FCHEV的生命周期成本都大大降低。在2030年的情景中,FCEV的动力总成生命周期成本从7360美元到22580美元,而BEV的动力总成生命周期成本从6460美元到11420美元不等,而FCHEV的生命周期成本从4310美元到12540美元。所有车辆平台均对动力总成成本具有显着的成本敏感性。BEV和FCHEV对电力成本相对不敏感,但FCHEV和FCV对氢成本敏感。BEV和FCHEV在生命周期成本方面相当相似,并且一个可能比另一个更具有优势。取决于驾驶模式。一个关键的结论是,FCEV未来发展的最佳途径是FCHEV。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2010年第1期|24-29|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department Earth Science Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;

    Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;

    Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;

    Energy Futures Lab, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;

    Department Earth Science Engineering, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    fuel cell vehicle; electric vehicle; hybrid vehicle;

    机译:燃料电池汽车电动汽车混合动力汽车;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号