...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development
【24h】

Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development

机译:我们应该建造更多的大水坝吗?水电大项目开发的实际成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A brisk building boom of hydropower mega-dams is underway from China to Brazil. Whether benefits of new dams will outweigh costs remains unresolved despite contentious debates. We investigate this question with the "outside view" or "reference class forecasting" based on literature on decision-making under uncertainty in psychology. We find overwhelming evidence that budgets are systematically biased below actual costs of large hydropower dams-excluding inflation, substantial debt servicing, environmental, and social costs. Using the largest and most reliable reference data of its kind and multilevel statistical techniques applied to large dams for the first time, we were successful in fitting parsimonious models to predict cost and schedule overruns. The outside view suggests that in most countries large hydropower dams will be too costly in absolute terms and take too long to build to deliver a positive risk-adjusted return unless suitable risk management measures outlined in this paper can be affordably provided. Policymakers, particularly in developing countries, are advised to prefer agile energy alternatives that can be built over shorter time horizons to energy megaprojects.
机译:从中国到巴西,水电巨型水坝正在兴旺发展。尽管存在争议,但新水坝的收益是否会超过成本仍未得到解决。我们根据有关心理学不确定性决策的文献,以“外部观点”或“参考类别预测”来调查这个问题。我们发现,有压倒性的证据表明,预算系统地偏重于大型水电大坝的实际成本,不包括通货膨胀,大量债务偿还,环境和社会成本。我们首次使用同类最大,最可靠的参考数据以及应用于大型水坝的多级统计技术,成功地拟合出简约模型来预测成本和进度超支。外部观点认为,在大多数国家中,大型水电大坝的绝对成本太高,建造所需的时间太长,无法提供经风险调整后的正收益,除非能够以合理的价格提供本文中概述的适当的风险管理措施。建议政策制定者,尤其是发展中国家的决策者,比能源大项目更喜欢可以在较短的时间范围内构建的敏捷能源替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号