...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Technoeconomic assessment of beetle kill biomass co-firing in existing coal fired power plants in the Western United States
【24h】

Technoeconomic assessment of beetle kill biomass co-firing in existing coal fired power plants in the Western United States

机译:美国西部现有燃煤电厂甲虫杀死生物质共烧的技术经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Widespread mortality of forests in the western United States due to a bark beetle epidemic provides a source of biomass for power generation. This study assessed availability and economics of co-firing beetle kill biomass with coal in power plants in the western U.S. Since biomass may be considered carbon neutral under careful management, co-combustion of biomass with coal provides power plants a way to meet emission reduction requirements, such as those in the EPA Clean Power Plan (CPP). Cost has been a barrier to co-firing, but the economics are altered by emission reduction requirements, such as CPP guidelines. The present study assessed beetle kill biomass availability in national forests in Wyoming and Colorado through Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis of U.S. Forest Service (USFS) data. Power plants near beetle kill mortality were identified as candidates for co-firing. An economic assessment of costs to implement co-firing was conducted. Co-firing reduces the need for the USFS to manage beetle kill trees when they are harvested for energy use, and these mitigated treatment costs were considered as an effective subsidy of co-firing. The results of this analysis include beetle kill availability, costs, and annual CO2 emissions reductions that can be met by co-firing. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:由于树皮甲虫的流行,美国西部森林的广泛死亡为发电提供了生物量来源。这项研究评估了美国西部发电厂与煤共烧甲虫杀死生物质的可用性和经济性由于在精心管理下生物质可被视为碳中性,生物质与煤的共燃烧为发电厂提供了满足减排要求的途径,例如EPA清洁能源计划(CPP)中的内容。成本一直是共同点火的障碍,但是由于减排要求(例如CPP指南)而改变了经济学。本研究通过美国森林服务局(USFS)数据的地理信息系统(GIS)分析,评估了怀俄明州和科罗拉多州国家森林中甲虫的杀灭生物量。甲虫杀死死亡率附近的发电厂被确定为共燃候选物。对实施共烧的成本进行了经济评估。共生减少了USFS在为能源使用而采伐甲虫时杀死树木的管理,这些降低的处理成本被认为是共生的有效补贴。该分析的结果包括甲虫的杀灭能力,成本和可通过共同点火解决的年度CO2减少量。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2016年第10期|429-438|共10页
  • 作者

    Beagle E.; Belmont E.;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Wyoming, Dept Mech Engn, 1000E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA;

    Univ Wyoming, Dept Mech Engn, 1000E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Beetle kill; Biomass; Co-firing; EPA Clean Power Plan; Greenhouse gases;

    机译:甲虫杀死;生物质;共烧;EPA清洁能源计划;温室气体;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号