...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >An empirical comparison of voluntary and mandatory building energy performance disclosure outcomes
【24h】

An empirical comparison of voluntary and mandatory building energy performance disclosure outcomes

机译:自愿和强制性建筑能源绩效披露结果的经验比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2010, the federal Australian government mandated the disclosure of energy performance ratings in advertisements for sale or lease of large commercial office properties. Prior to 2010, participation in the rating scheme was voluntary. This study first develops a theoretical model of mandatory disclosure policy effectiveness. Then, with a dataset of all ratings since inception of the voluntary regime in 1999, it tests the expectation that initial voluntary adopters have a greater tendency towards environmental stewardship and are more likely to manage and invest in environmental performance improvements, potentially dampening the effectiveness of mandatory disclosure policy. However, multiple statistical models of certification are unable to reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference in energy efficiency outcomes between the mandatory and voluntary adopters at equivalent stages. For urban policymakers, the extrapolation of voluntary adopter performance appears to be a good - perhaps even conservative - estimation of mandatory energy performance disclosure outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:2010年,澳大利亚联邦政府强制要求在大型商业办公物业的出售或租赁广告中披露能效等级。在2010年之前,参与评级计划是自愿的。本研究首先建立了强制披露政策有效性的理论模型。然后,利用自1999年实施自愿制度以来的所有评级数据集,检验了以下期望:初始自愿采用者具有更大的环境管理倾向,并且更有可能进行管理和投资以改善环境绩效,从而有可能削弱企业的有效性。强制性披露政策。但是,多种认证统计模型无法拒绝零假设,即在等效阶段,强制采用者和自愿采用者之间的能效结果没有差异。对于城市政策制定者来说,对自愿采用者的绩效进行推断似乎是对强制性能源绩效披露结果的一种很好的估计,甚至是保守的估计。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号