首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Sustainability performance for Brazilian electricity power industry: An assessment integrating social, economic and environmental issues
【24h】

Sustainability performance for Brazilian electricity power industry: An assessment integrating social, economic and environmental issues

机译:巴西电力行业的可持续发展绩效:结合社会,经济和环境问题的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The increased pressure on companies to address sustainability issues has resulted in the development of several voluntary corporate sustainability integration approaches. The array of existing approaches is large and overwhelming, resulting in companies not understanding what corporate sustainability really means for their businesses. Considering environmental, economic and social issues, this paper aims at assessing the performance of the Brazilian electricity power industry in terms of its sustainability performance. An analysis of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) indicators for the energy sector lead to an assessment of its sustainability performance by applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) specified with a directional distance function (DDF). Five scenarios were created: (i) Flexible weights; (ii) Triple bottom line; (iii) Social issues; (iv) Economic issues; and (v) Environmental issues. With considering (i) flexibility weights, almost all companies are efficient. We also found a significant difference when we compared (i) with the other four scenarios (ii, iii, iv and v). Taking into account the triple bottom line scenario (ii), the results indicate that companies were less efficient when compared with the flexible weights scenario (i). Taking into account the last three scenarios (iii, iv and v), only four companies were considered as providing top benchmarks in sustainability performance.
机译:公司应对可持续性问题的压力越来越大,导致开发了几种自愿的公司可持续性整合方法。现有方法种类繁多,势不可挡,导致公司不了解公司可持续性对他们的业务真正意味着什么。考虑到环境,经济和社会问题,本文旨在评估巴西电力行业的可持续发展绩效。对能源行业的全球报告倡议(GRI)指标进行分析后,可以通过应用以方向距离函数(DDF)指定的数据包络分析(DEA)来评估其可持续发展绩效。创建了五个方案:(i)权重灵活; ii三重底线; iii社会问题; iv经济问题; (v)环境问题。考虑到(i)灵活性权重,几乎所有公司都是有效的。当我们将(i)与其他四种情况(ii,iii,iv和v)进行比较时,我们还发现了显着差异。考虑到三重底线方案(ii),结果表明,与弹性权重方案(i)相比,公司效率较低。考虑到最后三个方案(iii,iv和v),只有四家公司被视为提供可持续发展绩效的最高基准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号