首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Co-benefits of integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in the Canadian energy sector
【24h】

Co-benefits of integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in the Canadian energy sector

机译:将气候变化适应和减缓措施整合到加拿大能源部门中的共同好处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The integration of climate change adaptation and mitigation theoretically provides four co-benefits of interest to the Canadian energy sector: 1) reduced competition for resources, referring to capital savings resulting from improved project efficiencies; 2) reduced influence of scientific uncertainty for adaptations resulting from the shorter timelines and measurable outcomes of mitigation projects; 3) harmonization of implementation objectives resulting from synergies between mitigation and adaptation projects; and 4) improved social license of mitigation projects provided by accrual of local benefits derived from adaptation. Through the investigation of eleven case studies, our research demonstrates the presence of these co-benefits where integration is observed. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) is used to link observed input variables to identified co-benefits. This research suggests that integration is an effective means of generating co-benefits that contribute positively to project outcomes. The research further concludes that effective leadership support, either through public-private partnership and energy policy, is one means of achieving such explicit integration. Energy policy, in the form of voluntary instruments and incentives, is recommended to build necessary public-private partnerships and support leadership. Such policy recommendations have applications far beyond the energy sector and the lessons learned here can likely be applied to cases outside of it.
机译:从理论上讲,气候变化适应和减缓措施的结合为加拿大能源部门带来了四个共同的利益:1)减少了对资源的竞争,这是指由于项目效率提高而节省的资金; 2)减缓项目的时间较短和可衡量的结果导致科学不确定性对适应的影响减小; 3)协调缓解和适应项目之间的协同作用产生的实施目标; 4)通过累积从适应中获得的当地利益来提供缓解项目的社会许可。通过对11个案例研究的调查,我们的研究证明了在观察到整合的情况下这些共同利益的存在。定性比较分析(QCA)用于将观察到的输入变量链接到已识别的共同收益。这项研究表明,整合是产生对项目成果有积极贡献的共同利益的有效手段。该研究进一步得出结论,通过公私伙伴关系和能源政策提供有效的领导支持是实现这种明确整合的一种手段。建议以自愿性手段和激励形式采取能源政策,以建立必要的公私伙伴关系并支持领导。此类政策建议的应用范围远远超出了能源部门,此处获得的经验教训很可能适用于能源领域以外的情况。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy Policy》 |2017年第12期|214-221|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Govt Yukon, 206A Lowe St, Whitehorse, YT 2C6, Canada;

    Univ Waterloo, Sch Environm Resources & Sustainabil, 200 Univ Ave West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada;

    Laurentian Univ, MIRARCO, Ontario Ctr Climate Impacts & Adaptat Resources, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada;

    Laurentian Univ, MIRARCO, Ontario Ctr Climate Impacts & Adaptat Resources, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, ON P3E 2C6, Canada;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Climate change; Energy policy; Adaptation and mitigation synergies; Canada;

    机译:气候变化;能源政策;适应和减缓协同作用;加拿大;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号