...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Prosumage of solar electricity: Tariff design, capacity investments, and power sector effects
【24h】

Prosumage of solar electricity: Tariff design, capacity investments, and power sector effects

机译:太阳能发电的起水:关税设计,产能投资和电力部门效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We analyze how tariff design incentivizes households to invest in residential photovoltaic and battery storage systems, and explore selected electricity sector effects. To this end, we develop an open-source electricity sector model that explicitly features prosumage agents and apply it to German 2030 scenarios. Results show that lower feed-in tariffs substantially reduce investments in residential photovoltaics, yet optimal battery sizing and self-generation are relatively robust. With increasing fixed parts of retail tariffs and, accordingly, lower volumetric retail rates for grid consumption, households have lower incentives for self-consumption. As a consequence, optimal battery capacities and self-generation are smaller, and households contribute more to non-energy power sector costs. A cap on hourly feed-in by households may relieve distribution grid stress without compromising PV expansion or prosumage models for households. When choosing tariff designs, policy makers should not aim to (dis-)incentivize prosumage as such, but balance effects on renewable capacity expansion and system cost contribution.
机译:我们分析关税设计如何激励家庭投资住宅光伏电池和电池储存系统,并探索所选电力部门的效果。为此,我们开发了一个开源电力扇区模型,明确地采用了起诉代理,并将其应用于德国2030场景。结果表明,较低的饲料关税大幅降低了住宅光伏的投资,但最佳电池尺寸和自发电是相对稳健的。随着零售关税的固定部分,因此,较低的电网消费量的体积零售率,家庭的速度较低。因此,最佳的电池容量和自发电较小,家庭贡献了更多的非能源电力部门成本。每小时由家庭提供的帽子可能会缓解分配电网压力,而不会影响家庭的光伏扩张或抽管模型。在选择关税设计时,政策制定者不应旨在(DIS-)促进起诉,但对可再生能力扩张和系统成本贡献的平衡影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号