首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >Does sharing backfire? A decomposition of household and urban economies in CO_2 emissions
【24h】

Does sharing backfire? A decomposition of household and urban economies in CO_2 emissions

机译:分享适得其反吗?家庭和城市经济的CO_2排放分解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Both multi-person households and dense urban areas reduce per capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by enabling people to share carbon-intensive goods within and between households. In this paper we estimate these household and urban economies in CO2 emissions using detailed household expenditure data for the United States. We then decompose these economies into their primary sources and investigate any potential rebound effects, or diseconomies. The results show that the bulk of household and urban economies come from reductions in emissions from residential energy use and private vehicle transportation. We also find some evidence of rebound effects, with both residential density and multi-person households increasing expenditures on air travel and restaurant meals in particular. These effects are small in comparison to the size of total net economies, suggesting that fears of large rebound effects or backfire effects may be overstated. These results further suggest that policies targeted at the provision of social and technological infrastructure, such as public transportation, mixed-use zoning, and public Internet may be most effective in reducing the rural-urban divide in private vehicle emissions.
机译:多人家庭和人口稠密的城市地区都可以使人们在家庭内部和家庭之间共享碳密集型产品,从而减少人均二氧化碳(CO2)排放。在本文中,我们使用详细的美国家庭支出数据估算了这些家庭和城市的二氧化碳排放量。然后,我们将这些经济体分解为它们的主要来源,并研究任何潜在的反弹效应或不经济性。结果表明,大多数家庭和城市经济体都来自住宅能源使用和私家车运输所减少的排放量。我们还发现了一些反弹效应的证据,居民密度和多人家庭尤其增加了航空旅行和餐厅用餐的支出。与总净经济体的规模相比,这些影响很小,这表明人们可能夸大了对大反弹效应或逆火效应的担忧。这些结果进一步表明,旨在提供社会和技术基础设施的政策,例如减少公共车辆排放的城乡差距,可能是最有效的,如公共交通,混合用途分区和公共互联网。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号