首页> 外文期刊>The Energy Journal >Energy Demand and Energy Efficiency in the OECD Countries: A Stochastic Demand Frontier Approach
【24h】

Energy Demand and Energy Efficiency in the OECD Countries: A Stochastic Demand Frontier Approach

机译:经合组织国家的能源需求和能源效率:随机需求前沿方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper attempts to estimate a panel "frontier" whole economy aggregate energy demand function for 29 countries over the period 1978 to 2006 using parametric stochastic frontier analysis (SFA). Consequently, unlike standard energy demand econometric estimation, the energy efficiency of each country is also modeled and it is argued that this represents a measure of the underlying efficiency for each country over time, as well as the relative efficiency across the 29 OECD countries. This shows that energy intensity is not necessarily a good indicator of energy efficiency, whereas by controlling for a range of economic and other factors, the measure of energy efficiency obtained via this approach is. This is, as far as is known, the first attempt to econometrically model OECD energy demand and efficiency in this way and it is arguably particularly relevant in a world dominated by environmental concerns with the subsequent need to conserve energy and/or use it as efficiently as possible. Moreover, the results show that although for a number of countries the change in energy intensity over time might give a reasonable indication of efficiency improvements; this is not always the case. Therefore, unless this analysis is undertaken, it is not possible to know whether the energy intensity of a country is a good proxy for energy efficiency or not. Hence, it is argued that this analysis should be undertaken to avoid potentially misleading advice to policy makers.
机译:本文试图使用参数随机前沿分析(SFA)来估计1978年至2006年期间29个国家的面板“前沿”整体经济总能源需求函数。因此,与标准能源需求计量经济学估算不同,每个国家的能源效率也都经过建模,并且认为这代表了每个国家随时间推移的基本效率以及OECD 29个国家相对效率的度量。这表明,能源强度并不一定是能源效率的良好指标,而通过控制一系列经济因素和其他因素,可以通过这种方法获得能源效率的度量。就目前所知,这是对以这种方式对经合组织能源需求和效率进行计量经济学建模的首次尝试,并且可以说在与环境有关的世界中,节能与/或高效利用能源的需求尤其重要。尽可能。此外,结果表明,尽管对于许多国家来说,能源强度随时间的变化可能会合理地表明效率有所提高;这并非总是如此。因此,除非进行此分析,否则无法知道一个国家的能源强度是否可以很好地代表能源效率。因此,有人认为应该进行这种分析以避免对决策者的潜在误导性建议。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Energy Journal》 |2011年第2期|p.59-80|共22页
  • 作者单位

    Corresponding author. Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE), ETH Zurich. Depart-ment of Economics, University of Lugano, Switzerland;

    Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC) and Research Group on Lifestyles Values and Envi-ronment (RESOLVE), Department of Economics, University of Surrey, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号