...
首页> 外文期刊>The Energy Journal >Investment vs. Refurbishment: Examining Capacity Payment Mechanisms Using Stochastic Mixed Complementarity Problems
【24h】

Investment vs. Refurbishment: Examining Capacity Payment Mechanisms Using Stochastic Mixed Complementarity Problems

机译:投资与翻新:使用随机混合互补问题研究容量支付机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Capacity remuneration mechanisms exist in many electricity markets. Capacity mechanism designs do not explicitly consider the effects of refurbishment of existing generation units in order to increase their reliability. This paper presents a stochastic mixed complementarity problem to examine the impact of refurbishment on electricity prices and generation investment. Capacity payments are found to increase reliability when refurbishment is not possible, while capacity payments and reliability options yield similar results when refurbishment is possible. Final costs to consumers are similar under the two mechanisms with the exception of the initial case of overcapacity.
机译:容量补偿机制存在于许多电力市场中。容量机制设计未明确考虑翻新现有发电机组的效果以提高其可靠性。本文提出了一个随机的混合互补问题,以检验翻新对电价和发电投资的影响。当不可能进行翻新时,发现容量支付可以提高可靠性,而当可能进行翻新时,容量支付和可靠性选项会产生相似的结果。在两种机制下,消费者的最终成本是相似的,除了最初的产能过剩情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号