Comparison Of Different Natural Sorbents For Removing Co_2 From Combustion Gases, As Studied In A Bench-scale Fluidized Bed

摘要

The reaction of CO_2 with porous particles of CaO in CaO_((cr)) + CO_(2(g)) →CaCO_(3(cr)) was studied, along with its reverse reaction, for chicken eggshells, mussel shells, and limestone. Reaction I is a promising way of removing CO_2, e.g., from the exhaust of a power station, so that a pure stream of CO_2 can subsequently be produced for sequestration by calcining (roasting) the solid CaCO_3 from reaction I. The reverse of reaction I regenerates the sorbent, which can thus be used cyclically. The forward and reverse steps of reaction I were investigated using a small electrically heated bed of sand at ~750 ℃, fluidized by N_2. Typically, a sample (～2 g) of cleaned calcareous material (sieved to～600 μm) was added to the hot bed, and the CO_2 produced was measured, while the material was fully calcined. Next, enough CO_2 was added to the fluidizing N_2 to raise [CO_2] to above the value for equilibrium; thus, the CaO was carbonated. This forward step of reaction I is shown to exhibit an apparent final conversion, the carrying capacity of the sorbent, below unity. This carrying capacity reduces after several cycles of calcination and carbonation, because blockage of pores denies access of CO_2 to part of the CaO. After several such cycles, particles were removed from the reactor, either in their partially carbonated or fully calcined states, for studies using gas adsorption analysis, X-ray diffraction, and mercury porosimetry. Interestingly, it was found for all three sorbents that the carrying capacity of CaO for CO_2 degraded at a similar rate. The carrying capacity was roughly proportional to the volume of pores narrower than～100 nm, as measured by Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) gas adsorption analysis. Evidently, these narrow pores contain both the surface area for CO_2 to absorb and the empty volume to accommodate the product, CaCO_3. The resistance of eggshells to attrition was broadly comparable to that of Purbeck (U.K.) limestone.