首页> 外文期刊>Energy & Fuels >Measuring CO_2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures: Slim-Tube or Rising-Bubble Method?
【24h】

Measuring CO_2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures: Slim-Tube or Rising-Bubble Method?

机译:测量CO_2最小混溶压力:细长管法还是上升气泡法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Determinations of carbon dioxide minimum miscibility pressures (MMP) using a slim-tube apparatus were compared with those using a rising-bubble apparatus (RBA). MMPs were determined for 12 different oils, with gravities varying from 34 to 51 °API. The results were found to compare very well when using a specific criterion for the slim-tube MMP. Although the slim-tube method is often referred to as the industry standard, there is no standard design, no standard operating procedure, and no standard criterion for determining MMPs with the slim tube. It is shown that the RBA is faster and more reliable than the slim tube for determining MMP. Bubble behavior is described for both the vaporizing and condensing gas processes.
机译:比较了使用细管设备和使用上升气泡设备(RBA)测得的二氧化碳最小混溶压力(MMP)。测定了12种不同油的MMP,比重从34到51°API。使用细管MMP的特定标准时,发现结果比较好。尽管细管法通常被称为行业标准,但没有标准设计,标准操作程序,也没有用于确定细管MMP的标准标准。结果表明,用于确定MMP的RBA比细管更快,更可靠。描述了汽化和冷凝气体过程的气泡行为。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & Fuels》 |1996年第2期|p.443-449|共7页
  • 作者单位

    College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, P.O. Box 5969, Safat 13060, Kuwait;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 TK-;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号