首页> 外文期刊>Energy & fuels >Two Nonnegligible Factors Influencing Lignocellulosic Biomass Valorization: Filtration Method after Pretreatment and Solid Loading during Enzymatic Hydrolysis
【24h】

Two Nonnegligible Factors Influencing Lignocellulosic Biomass Valorization: Filtration Method after Pretreatment and Solid Loading during Enzymatic Hydrolysis

机译:影响木质纤维素生物质载物的两种非阻级因素:酶水解过程中预处理和固体载荷后的过滤方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Valorization of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels has received considerable attention for decades with tremendous thermochemical pretreatments proposed. However, inconsistencies among studies in lignin removal can often be misleading and even violate the chemical mechanism, which might be attributed to the variation in the filtration method used after pretreatment. A phenomenon, promoting pretreatment strategies based on sugar conversion efficiency or yield only from single and random low-solid enzymatic hydrolysis, was also observed. Herein, the effects of filtration methods using a slow drip metal filter (SDMF) with an aperture of 0.2 mm and Whatman grade 4 filter paper (WGFP) with an aperture of 20–25 μm under vacuum filtration after liquid hot water (LHW), acid, and alkali pretreatments on the chemical composition of the solid and liquid, sugar recoveries, and lignin removal and solid loading (2–15%) on enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover and poplar wood were investigated. Results showed that SDMF increased the glucan content (1.1–3.0%) in pretreated biomass and induced solid loss (3.8–12.6%) into the filtrates, resulting in lower sugar recoveries and overestimated lignin removal compared to WGFP. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and furfural derived from sugar degradation triggered pseudolignin formation, inducing a negative lignin removal for both LHW and acid pretreated biomass. In comparison, alkali pretreatment neutralized the weak acids released from sugar decomposition and achieved a robust delignification (67.8–90.8%). Solid loading used for enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated biomass determined sugar concentration, conversion efficiency, and yield. This result indicates that promoting pretreatment technologies based on sugar conversion efficiency or yield of enzymatic hydrolysis at low solid loading may be misleading. This work demonstrates that the filtration method used for solid and liquid separations after pretreatment and solid loading for enzymatic hydrolysis should be cautiously selected and implemented when valorizing biomass into biofuels.
机译:木质纤维素生物质的算入生物燃料已经得到了大约几十年的巨大的热化学预处理的关注。然而,木质素去除的研究中的不一致通常可以误导,甚至违反了化学机制,这可能归因于预处理后使用过滤方法的变化。还观察到一种现象,促进基于糖转化效率的预处理策略或仅来自单一和随机的低固体酶解水解的产量。在此,过滤方法使用慢滴水金属过滤器(SDMF)的孔径为0.2mm和Whatman等级4级滤纸(WGFP),在液体热水(LHW)之后的真空过滤处具有20-25μm的孔径,酸,并在固体和液体,糖回收率的化学组成的碱预处理,和木质素去除和对玉米秸秆和杨木的酶促水解固体载量(2-15%)进行了调查。结果表明,SDMF在预处理的生物质中增加了葡聚糖含量(1.1-3.0%),并诱导固体损失(3.8-12.6%)进入滤液中,导致与WGFP相比较低的糖回收率和高估木质素去除。 5-羟甲基糠醛(HMF)和糠醛衍生自糖降解引发的假毒素形成,诱导LHW和酸预处理生物质的负木质素去除。相比之下,碱预处理中和糖分分解释放的弱酸,并达到了稳健的脱泻(67.8-90.8%)。用于酶水解预处理生物质的固体载量确定糖浓度,转化效率和产率。该结果表明,基于糖转化效率或在低固体载量下酶水解产率促进预处理技术可能是误导性的。该工作表明,在预处理和固体加载后用于固体和液体分离的过滤方法应谨慎选择并在将生物质纳入生物燃料中进行致慎选择和实施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & fuels》 |2021年第2期|1546-1556|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Kansas State University;

    Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Kansas State University|College of Food Science and Engineering Henan University of Technology;

    Department of Grain Science and Industry Kansas State University;

    Department of Grain Science and Industry Kansas State University;

    Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering Kansas State University;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号