首页> 外文期刊>Energy & fuels >Evaluating the Benefits of Data Fusion and PARAFAC for the Chemometric Analysis of FT-ICR MS Data Sets from Gas Oil Samples
【24h】

Evaluating the Benefits of Data Fusion and PARAFAC for the Chemometric Analysis of FT-ICR MS Data Sets from Gas Oil Samples

机译:评估数据融合和PARAFAC对来自瓦斯油样品的FT-ICR MS数据组化学计量分析的益处

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Advanced characterization of the products of the hydrotreatment of gas oils is of high interest for refiners and can be achieved using ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS). However, the analysis of gas oil samples by FT-ICR MS generates complex data sets with numerous variables whose exhaustive analysis requires the use of multivariate methods. Relevant information about nitrogen and sulfur compounds contained in several industrial gas oils are obtained by using three different ionization modes that are electrospray ionization (ESI) used in positive and negative polarities and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) used in positive polarity. For data sets generated for a single ionization mode, classical multivariate methods such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are commonly used. When the key information is spread into several ionization modes and thus into several data sets, a data fusion approach is highly interesting to simultaneously explore these data sets and can be followed by Parallel Factor analysis (PARAFAC). Nevertheless, many more variables are simultaneously considered when data fusion is performed and the sensitivity of PARAFAC and its ability to extract the most relevant variables compared to classical multivariate methods has not been assessed yet in the framework of FT-ICR MS. In this paper, a comparison of the classical data analysis (PCA) approach and the data fusion combined with the PARAFAC analysis approach is presented. The results have shown that applying PARAFAC on fused data sets is highly sensitive and able to put forward features and variables that are individually identified through classical data analysis with greater ease of implementation and interpretation of results. As an example, dibenzothiophenes and carbazole families (DBE 9) have explained most of the variance between samples and remain the most refractory compounds in hydrotreated samples. A significant difference in alkylation between the different types of gas oils has also been spotted. This paper validates the power and efficiency of this approach to explore complex data sets simultaneously without any loss of significant information.
机译:高级汽油液的产品的先进表征对于精炼机具有高兴趣,并且可以使用超高分辨率质谱(FT-ICR MS)来实现。然而,通过FT-ICR MS对瓦斯油样品的分析产生复杂数据集,其中具有许多变量,其详尽分析需要使用多元方法。通过使用用于正极性的正极和负极高度和大气压光相(APPI)的电喷雾电离(ESI)来获得有关若干工业气体油中含有的氮和硫化合物的相关信息。对于为单个电离模式生成的数据集,通常使用诸如主成分分析(PCA)的经典多变量方法。当关键信息被扩展到几种电离模式并因此进入几个数据集时,数据融合方法非常有趣,以便同时探索这些数据集,并且可以跟随并行因子分析(PARAFAC)。然而,当在FT-ICR MS的框架中尚未评估数据融合时,当执行数据融合以及PARAFAC的灵敏度及其提取最相关变量的能力时,尚未在FT-ICR MS的框架中评估更多的变量。本文介绍了经典数据分析(PCA)方法和数据融合与PARAFAC分析方法的比较。结果表明,在融合数据集上应用PARAFAC是高度敏感的,并且能够提出通过古典数据分析单独识别的特征和变量,并更简单地实现和解释结果。作为一个例子,二苯并噻吩和咔唑家族(DBE 9)已经解释了样品之间的大部分差异,并且仍然是加氢处理样品中最耐火化合物。还发现了不同类型的瓦斯油之间的烷基化的显着差异。本文验证了这种方法的功率和效率,可以同时探索复杂数据集,而不会丢失任何重要信息。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & fuels》 |2020年第7期|8195-8205|共11页
  • 作者单位

    IFP Energies Nouvelles F-69360 Solaize France;

    IFP Energies Nouvelles F-69360 Solaize France;

    IFP Energies Nouvelles F-69360 Solaize France;

    IFP Energies Nouvelles F-69360 Solaize France;

    IFP Energies Nouvelles F-69360 Solaize France;

    IFP Energies Nouvelles F-69360 Solaize France;

    Univ Lille CNRS UMR 8516 LASIRE Lab Avance Spectroscop Interact React & En F-59000 Lille France;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号