首页> 外文期刊>Energy & environmental science >2-Photon tandem device for water splitting: comparing photocathode first versus photoanode first designs
【24h】

2-Photon tandem device for water splitting: comparing photocathode first versus photoanode first designs

机译:用于水分解的2光子串联设备:比较光电阴极优先设计和光电阳极优先设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Within the field of photocatalytic water splitting there are several strategies to achieve the goal of efficient and cheap photocatalytic water splitting. This work examines one particular strategy by focusing on monolithically stacked, two-photon photoelectrochemical cells. The overall aim of the analysis is to compare the relative merits of two fundamentally different designs: one, where the photoanode is the large bandgap material (light-facing side), and the other, where the photocathode is the large bandgap material. Even though the former design is often shown in the literature, the present analysis shows that the latter design has several advantages. This is particularly true when considering designs that incorporate protection layers to protect the photoabsorbers. A high throughput computational screening was used to filter materials databases in search of candidates with the correct properties. These results show that without protective layers there are scarcely any materials which seem viable as photoabsorbers whereas with protection layers there are significantly more candidates. Since the protection layer (and redox catalysts) on the light facing side should not interfere with light absorption, this is the more difficult side to optimize. Nevertheless, by using TiO_2 as a transparent cathode protection layer in conjunction with known H_2 evolution catalysts, protection is clearly feasible for a large bandgap photocathode. This suggests that there may be promising strategies for photocatalytic water splitting by using a large bandgap photocathode and a low bandgap photoanode with attached protection layers.
机译:在光催化水分解领域内,有几种策略可以实现有效和廉价的光催化水分解的目标。这项工作通过关注单片堆叠的双光子光电化学电池,研究了一种特殊的策略。分析的总体目的是比较两种根本不同的设计的相对优点:一种是光电阳极是大的带隙材料(面向光的一面),另一种是光电阴极是大的带隙材料。尽管前者的设计经常出现在文献中,但目前的分析表明后者的设计具有许多优点。当考虑采用包含保护层以保护光吸收剂的设计时,尤其如此。高通量计算筛选用于筛选材料数据库,以搜索具有正确属性的候选对象。这些结果表明,没有保护层几乎没有任何材料似乎可以用作光吸收剂,而具有保护层的材料则明显更多。由于面向光侧的保护层(和氧化还原催化剂)不应干扰光吸收,因此这是最难优化的一侧。然而,通过将TiO_2与已知的H_2析出催化剂一起用作透明阴极保护层,对于大带隙光电阴极显然是可行的。这表明,通过使用带隙​​较大的光电阴极和带保护层的低带隙光电阳极,可能有光催化水分解的策略。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy & environmental science》 |2014年第8期|2397-2413|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Physics, CINF, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Physics, CAMD, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Physics, CINF, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Physics, CAMD, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Micro- and Nanotechnology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

    Department of Physics, CINF, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:12:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号