...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy efficiency >Assessing evidence-based single-step and staged deep retrofit towards nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB) using multi-objective optimisation
【24h】

Assessing evidence-based single-step and staged deep retrofit towards nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEB) using multi-objective optimisation

机译:使用多目标优化评估基于证据的单步并逐步对接近零能耗的建筑物(nZEB)进行深度改造

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There is a dearth of data and evidence in the literature to assist the industry in determining the most appropriate strategies for large-scale deep retrofitting of non-domestic buildings to achieve healthy low-energy buildings. Support to decision-making and enabling deep retrofit of these buildings requires approaches such as long-term renovation strategies and building renovation passports. This paper compares the impact of single-step and staged retrofit approaches to improve the building energy performance of an existing building to a nearly zero-energy building (nZEB) level with improved comfort and optimal life-cycle costs. The novel developed methodological framework is applied to a university building built in 1975 (partially retrofit in 2005) that is expected to be completely retrofitted in 2020. A set of scenarios are analysed for the case study building using a combination of retrofit measures towards achieving the cost-optimal non-dominated solutions (Pareto front) based on multiple-objective optimisation for the decision-maker. The results highlight that a single-step retrofit can achieve a reduction of up to 60% in primary energy consumption and reduction of 38% in discomfort hours. The findings also indicate that nZEB performance with the primary energy consumption in the range of ~ 75-90 kWh m(-2) year(-1) (with plug loads) can be achieved cost-effectively through single-step deep retrofit for a university building. Results also highlighted the inability to achieve higher energy performance or improved comfort in two stages relative to completing a deep retrofit in a single stage. The results aim to contribute to the existing debate on the economic and environmental feasibility in realising long-term renovation strategies for existing non-domestic buildings, especially university buildings.
机译:文献中缺乏足够的数据和证据来帮助业界确定最合适的策略,以对非住宅建筑进行大规模的深度改造,以实现健康的低能耗建筑。支持决策并实现对这些建筑物的深度翻新需要采取长期翻新策略和翻新建筑物通行证之类的方法。本文比较了单步和分阶段进行的改造方法的影响,这些方法可将现有建筑物的建筑物能源性能提高到接近零能耗的建筑物(nZEB)级别,并具有改善的舒适度和最佳的生命周期成本。新开发的方法框架应用于1975年建造的大学大楼(2005年进行部分翻新),预计将在2020年完全翻新。案例研究大楼使用一套翻新措施组合分析了各种方案,以实现以下目标:基于决策者的多目标优化的成本最优非支配解决方案(Pareto前沿)。结果表明,单步改造可以减少多达60%的一次能源消耗,并减少38%的不适时间。研究结果还表明,nZEB性能的一次能源消耗约为75-90 kWh m(-2)年(-1)(带插头负载),可以通过一步一步的深度改造来经济高效地实现。大学建设。结果还突出表明,相对于在单个阶段中完成深度改造,在两个阶段中无法实现更高的能量性能或改善的舒适度。研究结果旨在促进对现有经济和环境可行性的辩论,以实现对现有非住宅建筑(尤其是大学建筑)的长期翻新策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号