...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy efficiency >Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU-the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios
【24h】

Achievability of the Paris targets in the EU-the role of demand-side-driven mitigation in different types of scenarios

机译:巴黎能否实现欧盟目标-在不同类型的情景中需求侧驱动的缓解措施的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the Paris target of limiting global warming to well below 2 degrees C until 2100, at best even 1.5 degrees C, the question arises what this implies for the EU's mitigation targets and strategies. In this article, the reduction of carbon intensities and energy uses in the most ambitious mitigation scenarios for the EU, France, Germany, Italy, and the UK are compared to those of the EU in global 1.5 and 2 degrees C scenarios. An index decomposition analysis is applied to energy supply and each end-use sector (industry, buildings, and transport) to identify the main differences. From this, we derive conclusions concerning policies and indicators for an EU mitigation strategy compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees C. The index decomposition shows that reducing energy use is a stronger lever in the evaluated national scenarios than in the international scenarios for all end-use sectors. The reasons for that are the lower utilization of CCS, the inclusion of additional technology options, and a detailed consideration of sufficiency in the national scenarios. The results suggest that including more ambitious demand-side mitigation options (sufficiency, energy efficiency, electrification, and fuel switching) can significantly reduce the need for negative emissions that are required in all the existing 1.5 degrees C-compatible global scenarios. Driving these options requires substantial enhancement of current policies for all end-use sectors. In addition, certain index decomposition approaches are shown to underrate the long-term contributions of demand-side mitigation. Accordingly, demand-side mitigation tends to be under-represented in progress indicators for the Paris Agreement, which calls for improvements.
机译:巴黎的目标是将全球变暖限制在2摄氏度以下,直到2100年,最好是1.5摄氏度以下,这就提出了一个问题,这对欧盟的减排目标和战略意味着什么。在本文中,将欧盟,法国,德国,意大利和英国在最雄心勃勃的减排方案中的碳强度和能源消耗的减少与全球1.5和2摄氏度方案中的欧盟进行了比较。指数分解分析应用于能源供应和每个最终用途部门(工业,建筑和运输),以识别主要差异。据此,我们得出有关欧盟缓解战略的政策和指标的结论,这些政策和指标与将全球变暖限制在1.5摄氏度相适应。指标分解表明,在评估的国家情景中,与国际情景相比,减少能源使用是所有目标的更强有力的杠杆。使用部门。这样做的原因是CCS利用率较低,包含了其他技术选择以及对国家情景中的充足性的详细考虑。结果表明,包括更多雄心勃勃的需求方缓解方案(充足性,能源效率,电气化和燃料转换)可以显着减少对所有现有的与1.5°C兼容的全球情景中所需的负排放量。推动这些选择需要大幅提高所有最终用途部门的现行政策。此外,某些指数分解方法显示出低估了需求方缓解的长期贡献。因此,在要求改进的《巴黎协定》的进度指标中,减少需求方面的代表性往往不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号