首页> 外文期刊>Energy education science and technology >Influence of consumer behaviour and governmental policies in China, Hong Kong and India: An eco- impact assessment study of reusable shopping bags
【24h】

Influence of consumer behaviour and governmental policies in China, Hong Kong and India: An eco- impact assessment study of reusable shopping bags

机译:中国,香港和印度消费者行为和政府政策的影响:可重复使用购物袋的生态影响评估研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper provides details of a research project about the eco-impact of nonwoven and woven bags using the life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) technique and three different options. The three different options were as follows: usage and disposal criteria with the existing usage behaviour to reuse and governmental policies to recycle (option1), usage and disposal criteria as per consumer's perception if systems are in place (option2) and usage and disposal criteria in case of absence of recycling systems (option3). The first case, which was the bottom-line for other options, involved the study of the eco-impact of nonwoven and woven bags in their manufacturing phase, without considering their usage and disposal phases. The LCIA was accomplished by means of the Eco-indicator 99, a damage-oriented method for LCIA in SIMAPRO 7.2. The single score values calculated by the Eco-indicator 99 were used to compare the environmental impact made by these bags and a detailed explanation of results is provided in this paper. The next stage was the study of the eco-impact of these bags including their usage and disposal phases. This was undertaken with the three different options as stated above and the results derived were compared with the results derived from the baseline case, which was the focus of the study under discussion. The values for usage and end-of-life phases were obtained from the questionnaire survey of different user groups of shopping bags in China, Hong Kong and India. The results show that the eco-impact of nonwoven and woven bags is very high if there are no usage and disposal options provided. When the eco-impact values from options of existing possibilities and consumers' perceptions were compared, it was found that the eco-impact value was lower in option 1 in all the three territories for both types of bags, which was mainly attributed to the fact for option 1, a higher percentage of reuse was preferred to recycle and landfill categories. The eco-impact of these two types of bags was also studied with and without the presence of recycling systems in China, India and Hong Kong, where the eco-impact was lower due to the presence of recycling systems. These results indicate that a higher percentage of reuse could significantly reduce the eco-impact of nonwoven and woven bags.
机译:本文提供了有关使用生命周期影响评估(LCIA)技术和三种不同选择的无纺布和编织袋生态影响研究项目的详细信息。三种不同的选项如下:使用和处置标准以及现有的要重复使用的使用行为和要回收的政府政策(选择1),根据消费者的看法(如果系统到位)使用和处置标准(选择2)以及其中的使用和处置标准没有回收系统的情况(选项3)。第一种情况是其他选择的底线,涉及在其制造阶段研究非织造布和编织袋的生态影响,而不考虑其使用和处置阶段。 LCIA是通过Eco-indicator 99来完成的,Eco-indicator 99是SIMAPRO 7.2中针对LCIA的一种针对损坏的方法。使用环保指示符99计算的单个得分值来比较这些袋子对环境的影响,并在本文中提供了结果的详细说明。下一阶段是研究这些袋子的生态影响,包括其使用和处置阶段。这是通过上述三种不同的方法进行的,并将得出的结果与从基线案例得出的结果进行了比较,这是正在讨论的研究重点。使用和寿命终止阶段的值是从对中国,香港和印度的不同购物袋用户群的问卷调查中获得的。结果表明,如果没有提供使用和处置选项,则非织造布袋和编织袋的生态影响非常高。当比较现有可能性选项和消费者观念的生态影响值时,发现在这三个地区的所有三种类型的袋中,选项1的生态影响值均较低,这主要是由于以下事实:对于选项1,较高的重用百分比优先于回收和垃圾填埋类别。在中国,印度和香港,在有或没有回收系统的情况下,还对这两种类型的袋子的生态影响进行了研究,这些国家的生态影响由于回收系统的存在而降低。这些结果表明,较高的再利用百分比可以显着降低非织造布和编织袋的生态影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号