首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs
【24h】

An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs

机译:考虑资本成本的反弹效应的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Technological progress is one of the means of reducing energy usage and carbon dioxide (CO_2) emissions. However, this reduction, in turn, leads to a reduction in the real cost of energy services per unit, which results in an increase in the demand for energy services. Therefore, a reduction in the anticipated CO_2 emissions caused by a technological improvement might be partially offset in response to the cost reduction. Previous studies have referred to this effect as the "rebound effect." A large amount of empirical evidence on the rebound effect exists; however, most of these studies assume an exogenous improvement in energy efficiency, and thus, capital costs that may decrease the magnitude of the rebound effect are not taken into account expressly. This paper extends the scope of the research conducted by Brannlund et al. [Brannlund, R., Ghatwash, T., Nordstrom, J., 2007. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics 29, 1-17] in terms of two aspects: (ⅰ) considering capital costs explicitly as additional capital costs and (ⅱ) adapting an iterating procedure, and estimating the rebound effect, using Japanese household data. As a result of our empirical analysis, we conclude that the rebound is approximately 27%. However, we also find that ignoring additional capital costs leads to an increase in the rebound effect. In the case of Japanese households, the magnitude of the rebound effect increases to approximately 115%. Moreover, our simulation study shows that only a onetime iteration of Brannlund et al. [Brannlund, R., Ghalwash, T., Nordstrom, J., 2007. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics 29, 1-17] may lead to a biased result.
机译:技术进步是减少能源使用和二氧化碳(CO_2)排放的手段之一。但是,这种减少又导致单位能源服务的实际成本降低,从而导致对能源服务的需求增加。因此,由于成本降低,可能会部分抵消由于技术改进而导致的预期CO_2排放量的减少。先前的研究将这种效应称为“反弹效应”。存在大量关于回弹效应的经验证据;然而,大多数研究假设能源效率得到了外在的改善,因此,没有明确考虑可能降低回弹效应幅度的资本成本。本文扩展了Brannlund等人进行的研究范围。 [Brannlund,R.,Ghatwash,T.,Nordstrom,J.,2007。提高能源效率和反弹效应:对消费和排放的影响。 [Energy Economics 29,1-17]在两个方面进行了说明:(ⅰ)明确地将资本成本视为额外的资本成本;(ⅱ)使用日本家庭数据来调整迭代程序,并估计反弹效应。根据我们的经验分析,我们得出的结论是反弹约为27%。但是,我们还发现,忽略额外的资本成本会导致反弹效应的增强。对于日本家庭,反弹效应的幅度增加到大约115%。此外,我们的仿真研究表明,Brannlund等人只进行了一次迭代。 [Brannlund,R.,Ghalwash,T.,Nordstrom,J.,2007。提高能源效率和反弹效应:对消耗和排放的影响。 [Energy Economics 29,1-17]可能导致结果有偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号