...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy economics >Technology interactions among low-carbon energy technologies: What can we learn from a large number of scenarios?
【24h】

Technology interactions among low-carbon energy technologies: What can we learn from a large number of scenarios?

机译:低碳能源技术之间的技术互动:我们可以从大量场景中学到什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Advanced low-carbon energy technologies can substantially reduce the cost of stabilizing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Understanding the interactions between these technologies and their impact on the costs of stabilization can help inform energy policy decisions. Many previous studies have addressed this challenge by exploring a small number of representative scenarios that represent particular combinations of future technology developments. This paper uses a combinatorial approach in which scenarios are created for all combinations of the technology development assumptions that underlie a smaller, representative set of scenarios. We estimate stabilization costs for 768 runs of the Global Change Assessment Model (GCAM), based on 384 different combinations of assumptions about the future performance of technologies and two stabilization goals. Graphical depiction of the distribution of stabilization costs provides first-order insights about the full data set and individual technologies. We apply a formal scenario discovery method to obtain more nuanced insights about the combinations of technology assumptions most strongly associated with high-cost outcomes. Many of the fundamental insights from traditional representative scenario analysis still hold under this comprehensive combinatorial analysis. For example, the importance of carbon capture and storage (CCS) and the substitution effect among supply technologies are consistently demonstrated. The results also provide more clarity regarding insights not easily denionstrated through representative scenario analysis. For example, they show more clearly how certain supply technologies can provide a hedge against high stabilization costs, and that aggregate end-use efficiency improvements deliver relatively consistent stabilization cost reductions. Furthermore, the results indicate that a lack of CCS options combined with lower technological advances in the buildings sector or the transportation sector is the most powerful predictor of high-cost scenarios.
机译:先进的低碳能源技术可以大大降低稳定大气中二氧化碳浓度的成本。了解这些技术之间的相互作用及其对稳定成本的影响可以帮助制定能源政策决策。以前的许多研究通过探索代表未来技术发展的特定组合的少量代表性方案来应对这一挑战。本文使用一种组合方法,其中为技术开发假设的所有组合创建了场景,这些假设基于较小的代表性场景集。我们基于对技术的未来性能的假设和两个稳定目标的384种不同组合,估计了768次运行的全球变化评估模型(GCAM)的稳定成本。稳定成本分布的图形化描述提供了关于完整数据集和单个技术的一阶见解。我们使用一种正式的场景发现方法来获得有关与高成本结果最密切相关的技术假设组合的细微差别的见解。传统的代表性情景分析的许多基本见解仍然在这种全面的组合分析下仍然存在。例如,碳捕集与封存(CCS)的重要性以及供应技术之间的替代效应一直得到证明。结果还提供了有关通过代表性场景分析不容易否认的见解的更多清晰度。例如,它们更清晰地显示了某些供应技术如何可以抵制高昂的稳定成本,而最终使用效率的总体提高则带来了相对稳定的稳定成本降低。此外,结果表明,缺乏CCS方案以及建筑行业或运输行业技术进步较低的因素是高成本情景的最有力预测指标。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Energy economics》 |2011年第4期|p.619-631|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. College Park, MD, USA;

    Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. College Park, MD, USA;

    Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. College Park, MD, USA;

    Joint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. College Park, MD, USA;

    RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA;

    RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA;

    RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    climate change; technology rd; technological change; scenario discovery;

    机译:气候变化;技术研发;技术变化;情景发现;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号